this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
48 points (75.0% liked)

politics

19170 readers
4693 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

He really nailed it. He's the video clip: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C_BUG2OJd3T/

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheCannonball@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This guy is spouting more doom and gloom and trying to equate the two parties as "the same".

As a former expat, every single person I know that isn't an American native is very excited for the Democratic party.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That’s not at all what he said. He literally ended his comment with this:

I think that the choices have never been clearer between the two forms of capitalism.

If you know Juan Gonzalez and his long and storied journalism career, he is very clear about the dangers of right-wing extremism.

There’s a difference between being excited about Democrats’ newfound energy (I am super excited), and being realistic about what they can accomplish as one of two parties in a hyper-capitalist system.

[–] TheCannonball@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I agree with you, mostly.

My problem is that a lot of people want us to be so much more progressive and socialist that anything less than a full running leap to the left is being equated to disaster. And here's the thing, I used to be that way. I wanted Sanders so bad that I didn't vote for Hillary.

I'll regret that decision for the rest of my life. Friends of mine died during the pandemic because of that decision. So now, no matter how bleak, I will always vote for even the smallest step towards the side of decency.

I am realistic about it and i agree with Juan Gonzalez on the whole. I don't agree with his focus and his tone. His focus is on how it's not enough and his tone is doom and gloom. That's just exhausting.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I see this sentiment a whole lot. Unless you were like, one of the few thousand people in a swing district in a swing state, that vote, for/against/thirdparty/nonvote likely had zero impact. Tens of millions of voters have their votes dumpstered because of thr electoral college. California Trump voters and Tennessee Democrats, alike.

Unless you know your vote would've swung your district and also your state, do not sweat having put faith in a camp. Besides it is about policy, not people or party.

If someone is focused on people or party at the expense of any policy? You're probably not dealing with strong leftist sentiment to begin with.

[–] TheCannonball@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I was living abroad at the time. I was young and cocky. I made jokes about card games having to change the term trump to clinton cause she's going to beat him easily. I was wrong.

Then it got scary.

Now I live in NC and I can't wait to vote blue.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

That’s a totally fair critique, his tone can be a lot. And for what it’s worth, you didn’t kill your friends. You made a political calculation that didn’t pan out, and you understand now that it wasn’t a great decision. Don’t blame yourself for their deaths, it’s entirely possible, if not likely that the same thing would have happened if you had voted for Hillary. I understand the sentiment though, and the need to put the blame somewhere.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Maybe you’re just being salty, but Democracy Now is one of the most consistently factual and reliable left wing journalism outlets. They like, never do the both sides bullshit, and they regularly tear down the outlets that do.

They are, however, unabashedly pro Democracy. So they will totally call out the bullshit wherever it originates, and unfortunately Dems sometimes do sling the bullshit. But you’ll never hear NYTimes levels of bothsidesism from Democracy Now for the sake of fake objectivity.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

A kinder, gentler mass deportation and border militarization is pretty on point with the bipartisan border plan being touted.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

Democracy Now - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Democracy Now:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.democracynow.org/2024/8/23/juan_dnc
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support