this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
13 points (88.2% liked)

Memes

45535 readers
394 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In the end we are just gonna have to eat these billionaires wont we

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I'd be happy if they were just dead. The real question is how do effectively wipe out their wealth..

We don't need to take it. Just make it not exist. I've been thinking about this a bunch lately.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

The solution is obviously another coup in Guatemala to reduce their power usage

[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

the vast majority of pollution is created by the richest people in the world.

99% of the planet could produce zero pollution for the rest of our lives and it wouldn't even make a dent in the amount of pollution created by the billionaire class.

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Take a look at the Cargill family, 14 billionaires. From the wiki about the current CEO:

In 2019, former U.S. Congressman Henry A. Waxman, in a report by Mighty Earth, called Cargill "the worst company in the world" and noted that it drives "the most important problems facing our world" (deforestation, pollution, climate change, exploitation) "at a scale that dwarfs their closest competitors."

Do you think that is because they use every cent to burn coal and oil in their backyard, or

do you think it is because they produce and sell products to consumers which can not be produced without harm to the environment?

99% of the planet could produce zero pollution for the rest of our lives and it wouldn’t even make a dent in the amount of pollution created by the billionaire class.

How do you think they would create that damage to the environment if nobody would buy their products?

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How do you think they would create that damage to the environment if nobody would buy their products?

Selling to other billionaires and governments...

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They would sell $165 billion worth of meat, 22% of all meat products consumed in the US to a handful of billionaires and the US government? Ignoring the international business.

Billionaires would never touch that meat. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/10/zuckerberg-cattle-hawaii-beef-environment

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

China or Russia would probably buy it. Or the US military.

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

You think that after 99% of the US population decided to stop supporting climate change by not buying meat from billionaires, those 99% would still allow them to continue? Not for their own taste and convenience but for some billionaires profits?