this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
112 points (91.8% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4620 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 91 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

it's been covered recently that the reason he keeps doing outside rallies this time around is because he still has outstanding bills for venues all over battleground states from the previous election; it might also be relevant that it's easier to lie about crowd sizes outdoors as opposed to indoor venues with stated capacities. in summary, he's even more of a clown than ever.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 43 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He still owes El Paso, Texas roughly half a million.^[1] It's no wonder venues are hesitant to have him back. Though Trump's been stiffing workers and employees his whole life so the bigger wonder is that they trusted him to begin with.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Is there a reason this hasn't caught up to him? Isn't this theft of service, or fraud of some point with a clear, and intentional pattern? Why the fuck does this dude of all people seem to have the cheat code to do whatever the fuck he pleases? When is it enough?

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 12 points 3 weeks ago

That's what happens when a madman seizes control of a major political party. The Republicans are scared of his insane followers.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't know the reason, but since he has been scamming his whole life ^[1] ^[2] ^[3] I will continue to believe he will get away with everything forever until the opposite is proven.

EDIT: To actually answer the question a bit, part of it might be fear of getting on the bad side of someone well-connected, but otherwise the sad fact is just that the balance of power is so unfathomably unfairly biased towards the rich. What are they gonna do, you know? A lot of these people can't afford to sue him.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 3 weeks ago

The surprising part is the people who still fall for it. I can only guess he must use proxies or alternate names when agreeing to services and stuff. Who would see the name Trump and go forward thinking they'll see their money?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The event, billed as being focused on national security issues

He's 100% saying "national security" because he's worried about his personal security and can't understand how that's different.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, it's very transparent. We're all in on this joke - everyone but Trumpy and his dumpys.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

While Trump has acknowledged the race is closer than before Biden dropped out, his aides believe that Harris remains relatively unknown and that efforts to highlight her past statements and the positions she took in previous races will turn off swing voters after her honeymoon period ends.

Harris "relatively unknown?" Really? And it's been exactly one month since Biden stepped down. In the modern 24 hour news cycle, that's an eternity of a "honeymoon period."

[–] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world -4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

To be fair, she is relatively unknown.

Especially when you consider low information voters (which I expect have similar knowledge to high information voters from other countries).

Her honeymoon period will end as soon as she sits down and does a few serious and unscripted interviews about policy, which she has managed to avoid so far. At the moment it's pure vibes, but at some point you need to get into the business of explaining what you would do and being challenged on it. That will generate lots of attack angles and media stories, both good and bad.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think you can say the vice president is "unknown." Everyone has a general sense of her stances on things. It would be hard for her not to be a better unscripted speaker than Trump.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

She'll be better unscripted but also subjected to relatively massive judgement. There's pretty much nothing trump could say that would hurt him. There's a lot Harris could say that would hurt her.

[–] bobzilla@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, she could pull a Trump and be like, "I have really big plans. I can't discuss them until I'm in office, but let me tell you.... Big plans."

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Chicken under glass, is what's on the menu

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

A pressed ham… with gravy

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Can't wait to see him standing in a bullet proof box pontificating nonesense to the crowd.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

overheating without shade FTW

Can't wait for the "Please remember not to forget your Felon President in the back of a hot pope box" PSAs

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Of course he's holding more outdoor rallies, he can't afford to use any of the actually nice venues... he still owes them all money!!!!

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

This has the potential to be the funniest thing...

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

An event on national security, from behind bulletproof glass.

I’m sure he argued for background checks and other responsible gun ownership measures to keep guns out of the hands of weirdos. Right? Right?

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

It's gonna be like his previous interview all over again. Everything is to blame on "the immigrants" and other "undesirables".

[–] UsefulInfoPlz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I hope someone brings firecrackers… send him full melt down.