this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
22 points (92.3% liked)

Games

16611 readers
535 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not the bad kind of delay (like from changing developers years into development) for once. I might actually live to see both Half Life 3 and VTMBL2 released - I guess two back to back miracles like that wasn't a bit much to hope for after all.

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

HL3 is never gonna happen. Apophis will kill us all first. But Bloodlines 2 is actually in development.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

That image looks like a Skrull.

[–] indomara@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good! Delay it til 2030! I am tired of unfinished games being released leaving angry gamers to abuse the devs who put their heart and soul into it. The only ones who win are the studios.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's kind of a double edged sword. It's nice to say "I'm fine with that delay if it means we get a better polished game" as a consumer, but they gotta pay employees. More time means the game costs more money, which means it needs to perform better to turn a profit. It's a delicate balancing act.

[–] indomara@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

It definitely is, but these recent years have seen more and more unfinished games pushed to the finish line with game breaking bugs and missing content, all while charging AAA prices.

Capitalism is what it is, a metric for "success" cannot just mean you are profitable, you must be more profitable each year. Thus the enshitification of everything continues.

It is becoming difficult to "pay more for quality" as the quality of every publicly traded brand is the first thing that suffers when they are pushed to make more profits each year.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

I would like to remind people that previous examples of games that spent forever in development hell before finally coming out include Duke Nukem Forever and Limbo of the Lost, and neither are exactly on the Top Ten lists if you know what I'm saying