this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45489 readers
989 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Are you immortal? Do you have an income vastly higher than the servicing cost of that debt? Do you owe the large a majority of that debt to yourself? Are you able to, if push came to shove, tell your external creditors to go fuck themselves and dare them to so much as try to collect on the debt you don't feel like paying? If you can't answer "yes" to all these questions, you aren't the US and have a debt situation that has absolutely nothing in common with the US debt.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you had 34 trillion in debt and a centuries-long history of making on-time payments, you’d have a perfect credit score.

"Bankers hate him! Get an 850 credit score and dictate the terms and interest rate of your own debt using this one simple trick."

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Countries can print money. If the debt is denominated in your own currency you will never not be able to pay them.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I get your point, but they cant just "print" currency so we could actually not be able to pay when people/countries stop buying the bonds or lose faith in the system.

[–] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, that is not true. That states sell bonds is a self-imposed rule.

As long as a state collects its taxes in its own currency there will be demand for that currency.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What happens when they run out of people to sell bonds to and they run out of money to tax?

[–] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Then stop selling bonds and start investing directly (build schools, repair bridges, pay your employees, etc.).

Countries don't have to take the detour through state bonds because they can make money out of thin air. State bonds are a self-imposed and there's no law of nature that mandates using them.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How do they make money out of thin air?

[–] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Serious question? Money today is nothing more than a number in an account. When a country needs more of its own currency, it can increase it's account by that amount.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

No they cant, that is illegal. You could say they will change the law so that they can do that, but that is not possible (in america) at this time.

[–] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Okay, but even if the USA can't change the law regarding states bonds, it is virtually impossible that people stop buying US states bonds since the US Dollar is kinda like the most established currency in the world.

So your argument is completely theoretical.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago

I hear what you are saying, but that is changing, america is losing its strangle hold on the world. That became most evident with what we tried to do with Russia after their invasion and the cracks in our system are starting to become more obvious. Unless you think that the US will be the worlds reserve currency forever, there will be a time when it falls.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sooooo it’s a self imposed limitation, just like u/sockenklaus said?

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Kind of, but if the US allows itself to just print dollars directly its directly going to turn to toilet paper.

[–] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why would that happen? There's no proof that printing money (while considering the boundaries of the real resources like available work force) automatically leads to hyperinflation.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago

I guess there is no proof, but thats not really possible to prove. But what we can see is how much inflation the US has gotten just under the Fed, and then look at examples in the past like germany that used printing of the mark to pay of debts.

[–] karashta@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This.

More people need to understand that the debt of a sovereign nation isn't analogous to that of a household.

Public sector debt is private sector surplus.

[–] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Public sector debt is private sector surplus.

Yes! This is the very essence of our monetary system that nobody seems to understand.

[–] karashta@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago

The other person who responded to me made a very all written post but it gets a core assumption completely wrong.

They seemed to think that tax revenue in some way has to happen for spending to happen. That's why they think GDP has anything to do with our ability to service debt. But the federal government creates money ex nihilo.

Money has to be created before it can be destroyed through taxation. Spending and back stopping creation of money by private banks through the reserve system comes first. You can't destroy something you haven't created.

It's sad, really. Economists and politicians have blinded everyone with what I think of as "the money delusion".

It doesn't matter if the money can be "gathered up" to be spent on things we need. We do not rely on the money of the wealthy. What matters is actual, real resources and services we can provide.

The national "debt" is a misnomer. That's the amount of dollars left in circulation that have not been destroyed through taxation, as well as the "dollars" that pay interest which we call bonds.

I'm glad to see at least a handful of other people who understand. Fight the good fight, fellow human.