this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
347 points (97.3% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4536 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic United States Representative Ilhan Omar, one of the progressive House members known as the “Squad” and an outspoken critic of Israel’s war in Gaza, has won her primary race in Minnesota.

With 216 of 217 precincts reporting results, Omar had 56.2 percent, compared with 42.9 percent for Samuels, according to Minnesota Secretary of State tallies.

Samuels had criticised Omar’s condemnation of the Israeli government’s handling of the war on Gaza. While Omar has also criticised the Palestinian group Hamas for attacking Israel and taking captives, Samuels has accused her of being one-sided and divisive. He also stressed public safety issues in Minneapolis where a former police officer murdered Black man George Floyd in 2020.

Other “Squad” members Jamaal Bowman of New York and Cori Bush of Missouri have lost their party primaries over the past few months against opponents who had won substantial support from the pro-Israel fundraising group AIPAC.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 56 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

So happy to see at least one person dodge the AIPAC machine! I hope they spent a bunch of money losing this race!

[–] grozzle@lemm.ee 2 points 4 weeks ago

exactly $25.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 25 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Don Samuels is a corrupt garbage human, it should never have been that close regardless of your view of our Israel policy.

[–] RinseDrizzle@midwest.social 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

How so?

Edit: Oi, voted for Illy fwiw! Just never made time to dig up on the other guy and wanted some insights and intel from the community!

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 18 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

IIRC: He helped close down the poorest school in his city district instead of funding and fixing it. Championed broken windows policing that in part led to things like George Floyd and poor people I know getting massive fines for things like chipped paint on their house, leading to foreclosures and a debtors system with the city. Worked to kick out small businesses in favor of corporate chains. Tried to push poor people into neighboring districts and suburbs. Etc. Nothing he ever put his hands on helped people. I think it was very likely he was being paid under the table by business interests to do this stuff. If not, he is still a royal piece of shit.

When the revolution comes, he's on the short list of people to punch in the face.

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

He called the cops on a Get Out the Vote rally because they were giving away hotdogs. Also he hates unions.

[–] RinseDrizzle@midwest.social 5 points 4 weeks ago

I mean, honestly what the hell...

[–] RinseDrizzle@midwest.social 1 points 4 weeks ago

Cheers for the through write up! Sounds like a real piece of work...

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not from Minnesota and know nothing about Don Samuels or this primary, but anyone who'd run against Ilhan Omar is probably a garbage human.

[–] RinseDrizzle@midwest.social 1 points 4 weeks ago

Lmao, fair point!

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 21 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

AIPAC are saving their big guns for AOC

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 24 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

She won her primary a couple months ago and she's in a very blue district.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They can still fund her opponent in the general.

And I'm sure that if they succeed, lemmy's centrists will gloat just like they did when a genocidal regime bought candidates to unseat Jamaal Bowman and Cori Bush.

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

First part is true, but irrelevant since it's a blue district like I tried to explain to the other dude. When I say blue, I mean she more than doubled her next closest opponent (the Republican candidate)'s votes. It would be a waste of AIPAC's money from their perspective.

Second part sounds like fan fiction because the users on Lemmy I've interacted with don't sound like people who want to see a solidly blue district turn red.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Second part sounds like fan fiction

https://lemmy.world/comment/11621919

Call me a liar again.

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah, that pretty much aligns with what I thought. A comment downvoted to -122.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It doesn't mean AIPAC cannot fund the campaign of a more conservative Democrat.

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah it does, because in the general election, she'll be the only Democrat. That's the purpose of the primary.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world -2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Didn't we see one Democrat beat another the other week?

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That's a primary. Different places have primaries at different times.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

@tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world

I don't understand the point you two are making.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/20/nyregion/aipac-bowman-latimer.html

Edit: I think I understand your thought process. This isn't the only year with primaries and elections...

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 weeks ago

Thank you for this wonderful news.