this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

Android

17400 readers
379 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Its too fucking expensive for what you get. Throw in access to all movires and TV for $15, then maybe I'll subscribe.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Jesus Christ google, how much money are you spending to foil 0.000034% of your user base

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The purpose, is to keep it difficult enough that the "honest" person doesn't get the idea to start doing it.

Same concept as putting a lock on your front door. It's not to stop thieves, it's to stop the average person from getting the idea to "just take a quick look".

By occasional going after workarounds AND making it public news. Your average computer user thinks it's not worth the hassle.

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can watch Youtube without ads using an adblocker or NewPipe. Why anyone buys Premium is beyond me.

[–] thanatotus@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Could be one of the many reasons such as ensuring their favorite creators get paid for their views and end users not being tech savvy enough to know about ad blockers and NewPipe.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone -1 points 3 months ago

That's a poor reason. Google takes a big cut, just pay the YouTuber(s) directly through their favourite donation service; most have at least one these days. This is like when people claim they pay for Spotify because they "care about supporting musicians". It's delusional at best and a straight up lie at worst.

[–] Oisteink@feddit.nl 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It sounds kinda illegal. Can Coca-cola stop me from going to Denmark to buy for danish prices and claim I have to pay Norwegian prices?

It’s directly comparable to buying danish subscription and using the service from a danish exit. If my data originates in china and are vpn-ed to Denmark they have the same cost on providing me service as anyone else in Denmark

Edit: I’ve never been to China, but it’s like really far away from Denmark.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

In the EU, this is illegal. As an EU resident, you have the right to subscribe to any service in another EU country.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

so they prefer that users use adblockers?

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Well, no, they prefer people pay the subscription cost they set in each region.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but on one hand the price they want I'm not willing to pay, but if I could get it for less then I'd consider it.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like the service isn't quite right for you, then.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like the monopolized industry isn't right for the users

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What exactly is the monopoly here?

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Video content? YouTube's made it all but impossible to compete with their free offerings, for the cost of server upkeep alone

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How has YouTube made it impossible for another video hoster to allow free viewing with ads?

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The cost of server upkeep alone

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How is that Google's fault? What is your solution to this?

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Same as Walmart killing off every ma and pa shop is their fault, they lowbid the competition solely because they're able to with their monopolization, solution being actual competition in the industry.

Can't help but feel your goal posts are sentient with how much they're moving.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's only worth what people are willing to pay. Already have Spotify anyways and not a fan of googles app killing tactics, learned that the hard way a couple times.

[–] KillingAndKindess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Which they've shown they aren't willing to do...

Personally, YT premium is my only subscription I have, and wouldn't really have any others if money wasn't this tight. But I was paying before this recent anti blocker war, I prefer YT Music just because of the way it handles a bunch of the music remixed by seperate and probably not "official" artists. And with how much youtube I watch on mobile instead of my PC, messing with blocking wasn't very appealing to me, since the jump from YTmusic to full premium is less than almost any streaming sub.

But I have always watched/backgroundnoised a lot of youtube, so its not that much of pain. Realistically, this was bound to happen eventually, hosting that much content hasn't really gone down in costs as quickly as most tech overhead. But its a fairly complex line item, not just hardware & facilities, but all the law office hours related to copyright log is an ongoing and probably still growing cost for them and since they are not Disney thats a real cost I'd imagine.

As a side note, it just reminds me how shockingly unaware I am of how much they must value our personal data, that it only just now became worthwile to fight blockers with this much effort and PR/image depreciation.

[–] ladfrombrad@lemdro.id 1 points 3 months ago

how much they must value our personal data, that it only just now became worthwile to fight blockers with this much effort and PR/image depreciation.

You got it, on the nose.

Shadow boxing is always good practice.

[–] FuryMaker@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Isn't a cheaper subscription better than no subscription Google?

[–] geelgroenebroccoli@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago

Luckily they can't do this in the EU. As an EU-citizen, I have the right to subscribe in Romania, for example, and pay no more than a Romanian would.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Newpipe and its forks for the win.

[–] TheBigBrother@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ok I'm using revanced anyway..

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
[–] TheBigBrother@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

I will check it thx for the info

[–] TheBigBrother@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

NewPipe it's pretty good, I'm using revanced for YT Music and NewPipe for YouTube.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You might want to check out InnerTune or RiMusic for YTMusic, they are open source and don't spy on you, unlike Google's proprietary garbage

[–] TheBigBrother@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

I will check it thx for the info