Green - An environmentalist community

5278 readers

1 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!

RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith

Related communities:

Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

theloneforager@lemmy.ml

Chloe@lemmy.ml

Germany - The search for a final repository for nuclear waste may be delayed by decades (aussiedlerbote.de)

submitted 1 month ago by BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to c/green@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Rayspekt@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's with the jacked shirtless dude lmao

[–] vintageballs 6 points 1 month ago

Every article needs a shitty AI generated image nowadays

[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We know where the best spots would be geologically, but the Bavarians happen to live there. That's why the waste is stored in leaky former salt mines in Northern Germany, in rusty barrels. The Bavarians are big proponents of nuclear energy, but there's no way they want that shit buried in their glorious territory.

[+] StaySquared@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] cows_are_underrated 3 points 1 month ago

Its actually easier to send it out of our solar system than to the sun. And then there are the other reasons like limited capacity of rocket, costs, failing rockets, amount of waste etc.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

why can't we launch the waste to the sun?

Because we are talking about thousands of tonnes of highly radioactive waste (not counting the lower ones). A quick search tells me in the region of 15.000t for Germany. That alone makes it pretty expensive.

And then you want to launch it into space where every start you risk an explosion that spreads that waste?

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

That's a huge waste of energy.

If the "waste" is "highly radioactive" that means that is has A LOT of energy left in it. It should be reprocessed, recycled, and should provide power for another 20years. The whole idea of nuclear waste needing billions of years of storage is just propaganda to ensure nuclear reactors are never a threat to the existing fossil fuel markets.

By the way despite a huge increase in the amount of "green energy" produced by germany last year, they have also burned more fossil fuels then they ever have in history, same story in China, the US and other European countries.