this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
75 points (81.0% liked)

News

22839 readers
3651 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 98 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I am always wary of people like him and, over time, I found out that my instinct was once again correct.

This is why you cannot rely on philanthropy to make the world a better place. Also, this guy who is supposedly trying to improve the world is partnering with Samsung according to the article.

This Samsung: https://ipen.org/news/samsung-whistleblower-reveals-toxic-chemical-use-and-violations-samsung-vietnam

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago

He seems very self serving.

When I was younger I watched him a bit in his early days.

And whetever the “philanthropy” side sounded cool but most of his videos were massive wastes and pollution.

Like he’d destroy someone’s house and buy them a new better one. Or dumb stuff like that.

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I've avoided his content because something about him just creeped me out. After several years, I think I've finally pinpointed it: he doesn't smile with his eyes. It makes his grin seem cold and emotionless, like a sociopath trying to blend in.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Yeah people have been pointing that out for years. It's one of those things you can't unsee once you notice it.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago

Happens in a lot of advertising for anything. They start looking really creepy once you know this.

Also, this guy pulled it off on purpose perfectly:

"Like a dolls eyes..."

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I had never heard of this person before a few days ago.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ve heard of him for years and have ignored him from the start. He always just seemed like a giant douche canoe.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I think douchecanoe is technically one word

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Look at this douchecanoe sailing up in his douche canoe.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Nice. Am on mobile though.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's still one word even on mobile.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I'll let you take up the battle against auto correct if you think it worth the effort. I'll put my energies somewhere else.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I want to pronounce it "doosh-kay-noh", like volcano.

EDIT: just realised that posting while drowsy leads to spelling mistakes.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Fuck, now I can’t unsee this.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah you don’t want a hole in your douchecanoe.

[–] dmtalon@infosec.pub 13 points 1 month ago

I believe I only know of him because I have a teenager. I watch Youtube a lot and he's never on my feed.

[–] marius 7 points 1 month ago
[–] Magister@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Same, I don't follow anyone on YT, I rarely watch YT anyway

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hello Hello

I have a disability which makes watching youtube impossible anyways lol

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The article says he’s gained three million new subscribers since this has started.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Some of them are bound to be hatewatchers. Nothing to get people subscribing to your channel like controversy.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I have created this robot solely to hate

[–] maniii@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Upper Echelon on YT has part1 and part2 detailing the various attempts to coverup the incriminating evidence.

Criminals like exploiting "Identity" and that is all I will say about it.

It is sad to see creators covering up shady shit instead of coming clean and cleaning house. Actions speak louder than words.

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This seems like a run of the mill news attempt at controversy for attention. None of the "controversies" mentioned are particularly egregious. I don't think Mr beast needs me to defend him but the reactions to this seem way more extreme than the problems themselves.

How many of us know all of our friends and colleagues well ebough to know every dirty secret they have? If one of my friends were a pedophile but kept it well hidden, how am I to be held responsible for their actions when I didn't know?

An inexperienced production crew doesn't provide the best working conditions for a reality and stunt show? Color me surprised. Television has had shows that put people in danger for years, even from very experienced crews.

I know just about every one of us likely did or said something that was really, really stupid when we were teens. Turns out teenagers don't have fully developed brains and don't make the best decisions. Holding someone accountable for saying something dumb as a child, that they have publically apologized for later, seems like people going out of their way to find fault.

[–] undeffeined@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The pedophile friend in question did not hide their preference for minors from Mr Beast at all. One anedoctal evidence being they had a commissioned drawing of a pre pubescent girl with sexual overtones on their living room which Mr Beast saw several times.

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

That's actually good context that the article doesn't mention. Certainly very concerning.