The biggest advantage of bows in a gun setting would be stealth, can't shoot what you don't know is there. Makes the superhero stuff a bit difficult, though.
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
448 points (97.9% liked)
Comic Strips
12763 readers
2918 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
But what if you put a boxing glove on your arrow? Surely that would help
Also going through kevlar body armor with ease.
Not stab-resitant armour, though. They can easily swap one out with the other.
Or put on a jean jacket over the kevlar.
I'd still go with a repeating crossbow though, more power while being easier and faster to use.
According to un-sourced Archery Heaven, regular crossbows are as loud as a lawnmower, nevermind repeating. Not quite the stealth you might be looking for.
Bowstring twang is going to be loud no matter what at high draw weights. A high draw weight recuve would be loud too.
Yep, that's what the linked articles' conclusion was. But 80dB vs 120dB is a huge difference, jackhammer compared to a dishwasher. Anyway, I'm out of my depth, I shot a bow last 30 years ago. And never as a stealthy assassin nor archery-based superhero.
TIL the movies lied to me! I vividly remember John Rambo stealth-killing a camp of enemy fighters with a bow.
"easier to use" shouldn't really matter for Particularly-Good-At-Archery-Man. It's not like a bow is a particularly slow weapon, either (medieval archers were probably doing about 10 shots per minute), and you don't really need the additional power of crossbows - medieval war bows were able to kill armored knights, they were pretty much only limited by the archer's strength. Whether you need high power pretty much depends on the setting - if you're mostly fighting against human thugs who maybe wear a protective vest you don't need extremely high draw strength. If the setting is more fantastical, why WOULDN'T "particularly good at archery" include absurdly strong muscles that make the additional power of crossbows unnecessary?
Medieval archers weren't really aiming as much as just lobbing the arrows in a general direction.
So many heroes only attach blue-collar crime, and never tackle white-collar crime. It's classicist.
So many heroes only attach blue-collar crime, and never tackle white-collar crime.
Sooo... no different than the police, then.
Cue police with punisher badges
That's a villain, not a hero.
It’s classicist.
Crimen Omnia Ex Se Nata Vitiate.
love that one.
Being a sneaky archer is incompatible with hero monologues.
I'm sure there are plenty of other enemies he cannot defeat, like Just Bought a Pistol woman, or In Melee Range with a Dagger Man.