this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35015 readers
744 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

people have been demonizing it for most of the AD years i think but it's quite pleasant really. are there any proven negative effects?

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boletus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Jerking it is fine, but just like any coping mechanism, you can abuse it and get addicted to it, then it becomes a problem.

If you're doomscrolling porn, for example, then maybe it is having a negative effect on you.

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Christianity and Feminism.

[–] Archelon@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Christianity I can understand, but would you mind explaining why you think feminism demonizes masturbation?

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Feminism demonizes male sexuality.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That’s not an explanation you just restated the claim they asked you to elaborate on. What have you encountered that led you to this conclusion?

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes it is, masturbation is a part of male sexuality. If you demonize male sexuality any endorsement of male sexual expression is an explicit endorsement of the harmful male sexuality.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You’ve been clear about what you think dude, we want to know why you think it.

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Feminists posit that men are inherently predatory. See "toxic masculinity" debates. Influential feminists like Dworkin have even stated that any sexual intercourse with men is sexual assault.

Mainstream media, which is deeply influenced by feminism, depicts male sexuality as dangerous "any man can be a rapist" while lying by omission about female predators.

Being male is an inalienable trait and "toxic masculinity" inherently is borne from males. Things like sexual assault are "women's issues" even though studies show men are assault at near parity to women.

The list goes on, really shouldn't have spent so much time answering because it's so glaringly obvious so you're arguing in bad faith.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You’re making a lot of claims about things I don’t think you really have a grasp on. “Toxic masculinity” is not an implication that all men are inherently toxic. It’s a criticism of societal expectations for men that harm them and their relationships.

You’re saying that feminism has seriously hindered acceptance of male masturbation but all you’ve provided here is vague unsubstantiated implications of media bias and a single author’s name. I’m not going to read the entire collected works of whoever Dworkin is to figure out why you think they’re both representative of the entire feminist movement and also hate men wanking it. Give me something tangible here. A quote, a law they supported, a speech, a video, literally anything at all that isn’t just some insinuation that’s only attributable to yourself

I would consider myself a male feminist and I masturbate daily so if the movement thinks that’s wrong I’d like to know so I can stop describing myself as feminist.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Andrea Dworkin was an influential feminist mainly in the '80 and '90. She was pretty clearly anti pornography, at least as it existed in her time (she died in 2005. Who knows what she might think of some of the stuff out there today). She's also one of the most frequently misquoted feminists of all time, particularly by anti-feminists. she did not say all heterosexual intercourse was rape:

Several reviewers accused you of saying that all intercourse was rape. I haven't found a hint of that anywhere in the book. Is that what you are saying?

Andrea Dworkin: No, I wasn't saying that and I didn't say that, then or ever. There is a long section in Right-Wing Women on intercourse in marriage. My point was that as long as the law allows statutory exemption for a husband from rape charges, no married woman has legal protection from rape. I also argued, based on a reading of our laws, that marriage mandated intercourse—it was compulsory, part of the marriage contract. Under the circumstances, I said, it was impossible to view sexual intercourse in marriage as the free act of a free woman. I said that when we look at sexual liberation and the law, we need to look not only at which sexual acts are forbidden, but which are compelled.

The whole issue of intercourse as this culture's penultimate expression of male dominance became more and more interesting to me. In Intercourse I decided to approach the subject as a social practice, material reality. This may be my history, but I think the social explanation of the "all sex is rape" slander is different and probably simple. Most men and a good number of women experience sexual pleasure in inequality. Since the paradigm for sex has been one of conquest, possession, and violation, I think many men believe they need an unfair advantage, which at its extreme would be called rape. I don't think they need it. I think both intercourse and sexual pleasure can and will survive equality.

It's important to say, too, that the pornographers, especially Playboy, have published the "all sex is rape" slander repeatedly over the years, and it's been taken up by others like Time who, when challenged, cannot cite a source in my work.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Christianity and capitalism. If it doesn't make you feel guilty the Christians don't like it and if you can provide it to yourself for free the capitalists don't like it.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You kidding? Porn is a 4 billion dollar industry.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can jerk off without porn. Think of all the advertising and subscriptions on porn sites. Those have nothing to do with masturbation and everything to do with capitalism.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

Sorry you’re addicted to porn, G. Get help if you need it.

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

One major reason is that feminism, which deeply influences culture, posits that all men are rapists in the waiting. For an example here a quote from a prominent and influential feminist.

"Under patriarchy, every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman."

  • Andrea Dworkin

This chills any frank discussion of male sexuality because that would be implicit endorsement of sexual assault.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, feminism, an ideology that consists solely of extremist views. I'm not even well versed in feminism and I know that Andrea Dworkin is quite extreme and is a polarizing figure.

If you have reduced feminism to the views of a single extremist than you really need to get your shit together.

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

It doesn't consist of all extreme views but many mainstream feminist ideology had extremists views.

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.de 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is insane incel bullshit and you know it.

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Direct quotes are "insane incel bull****"? She really said that and the theme appears in all her writings.

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.de 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't care what one person said. Feminism will go away when sexism is gone. It's not war on men, it's a fight for equality. Using a random quote from one hurt and angry person to frame feminism as something evil is missing the point and pretty incel. Using feminism as an answer to why masturbation is not socially accepted is insane, really.

[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

literally good for you

I actually asked my family doctor at one point about the health effects of masturbation. She said that as a guy, if you are not otherwise sexually active, it's good for the prostate to keep the plumbing working down there.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ejaculation lower the risk of prostate cancer, so masturbation should probably be medically advised to all men.

4-7 times a week is a good number according this study