this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
544 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2253 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump is proving he’s racist and stupid with his latest post.

In a Truth Social post Thursday morning, Donald Trump appeared to suggest, again, that presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris isn’t really Black, ramping up his identity-based attacks to the horror of those in his party who consider racism a losing electoral strategy.

Earlier in the week, many GOP strategists, including in the Trump camp, worried that attacks on Harris’s race and gender—which seemed all but inevitable considering Trump’s history of racism and misogyny—would pose a serious liability for the campaign. “We hope he doesn’t act like a crazy racist and sexist person, but we can’t control him,” a source close to the campaign told The Washington Post.

These hopes were quickly dashed in the course of Trump’s interview with the National Association of Black Journalists Wednesday afternoon, in which the candidate claimed that, for years, Vice President Kamala Harris “was Indian all the way, and then suddenly she made a turn and she became a Black person.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 158 points 3 months ago (21 children)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 102 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Whatever the answer to that question is, the real answer is "dumber than that."

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Also acceptable: not as dumb as the people who vote for him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 80 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

He's a not really that dumb, he's a narcissist. Like, as a legitimate, detrimental mental condition.

Trump cannot backtrack and admit he is wrong, even if it's a small goof. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Dorian%E2%80%93Alabama_controversy

I know people like this in real life, and it's really sad, but also really annoying/grating.

[–] CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world 69 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

This is really reductive.

I think coverage of him before 2015 is much more enlightening. One I always point to is the Market Foolery podcasts on Trump, where (TL;DR) he tries to sell private real estate to his public company at highly inflated prices, and hyping the market to buy into this technically-not-illegal scheme.

Thing is, he's good at that kind of scheme. It worked! It wasn't illegal, just basically selling a turd. The Motley Fool saw through it (and met him in person to discuss it, which is what the podcast is about) and made the only short of their career, but still, people drastically underestimate Trump's ability to "sell" ideas that benefit him, to their detrement.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (13 children)

The guy is one of the dumbest people alive. He isn't good at anything but fooling dumb people. He is the king of the dumb people and there are more than we thought.

It's not reductive. It's factual. Quit polishing a turd. He's a moron. He can't even fuck a porn star and pay her without being caught. He's so dumb he can't hide investment lies without being caught. He can't plan to overthrow the government without documentation.

I know 5 year olds with more wit and social navigation.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Ioughttamow@kbin.run 17 points 3 months ago

But also dumb

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago (1 children)

His VP pick has children who are both white and Indian, but he still can't comprehend Harris can be black and Indian.

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, Trump and most of the MAGA base probably don't view the Vance kids as white at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 30 points 3 months ago

He's "look directly at the sun during an eclipse without eye protection" dumb. Plus he's old, sleepy, and a felon.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

More predictable than dumb, in that in any given situation the man will pick the absolutely worst choice available. Every single time. Even when that choice hurts him.

When his options are (a) pick the right choice, (b) pick a bad choice, ( c) do nothing, or (d) pick something you didn't even fathom because the idea was just so bad that even the biggest moron would dismiss it out of hand, he will go with D. Every single time. Even if it hurts himself. Thankfully, the man can't get out of his own way 95% of the time, and I firmly believe that making even something resembling a rational choice even on the most basic of options would cause him physical pain.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Profoundly dumb. But also super weird. And he hates being called weird.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 93 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I honestly think the more likely explanation is that he doesn't realize Kamala Harris and Nikki Hayley are different people. They're both just "that woman I'm running against" to him.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 82 points 3 months ago (8 children)

It doesnt matter. Every Trumpet in my office is eating this up. I pulled up a picture of her Jamaican dad. Their answer was "Jamaicans aren't black." I really dont know how to respond to that.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

Go to google maps, get them to select a random street view in Jamaica. Ask them to describe the people they’re seeing.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

...........dafuq??

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ShortFuse@lemmy.world 66 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

If being half Black means you cannot be Black, then Obama was a White man.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The racists are trying to appeal to both black and white voters here. They used to say that things like:

"What do you get when you mix clean water with dirty water?"

"Dirty water"

Now they're saying that people of mixed heritage aren't anything. That they're the Other.

Harris grew up in Oakland in a Black neighborhood. As usual the racists are cruel but here they're spreading an obvious lie designed to erode her standing among black voters

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

I hope she gets one of those "black jobs"...like President.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Don't beat them with their own arguments! It just confuses them...

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Okay I'm starting to really believe that trump was a puppet carefully managed since the 2016 election that slowly fell apart as he actually got power and became president and fired literally everyone who didn't lick his boots. Seriously almost forgot how almost all of the news for like a year was like, some tweets and trump fires someone or attacks them (the latter never stops) I digress

He is so clearly floundering for the first time. This fucker has never had bad press until now. He isn't different or anything, just suddenly some people are realizing and agree the emperor isn't wearing clothes. That cost him so much powerful support. I speculate the evangical Republicans, who are still a major contribution to conservative politics today, are withdrawing their resources and efforts this election cycle to regroup and plan how to handle the next 2 years to the best of their advantage.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 45 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Well, no. He's been floundering since he fucked up COVID. That was something he could bluster his way through. Republicans could see their friends and family dying.

That's why he lost. He's bad at being president. Plus old and weird.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago (4 children)

How many conservatives do you know that admit the severity of covid after the fact, even after losing loved ones?

Their heads are firmly buried in the sand. It's a non-factor of that voting demographic.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

My sister is adamant my dad didn't die of covid despite you know, getting covid and dying in the hospital a few days later. And the death certificate states the cause of death as Covid. Oh, he most likely caught it in her bar which she reopened as soon as the WI supreme court ruled that lock down doesn't apply to bars.

[–] Hazzia@infosec.pub 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I have a conservative friend whose father died from covid which absolutely devistated her. She's from a small rural town she used to love but cannot stand it anymore because everyone she knew there was like "god's plan" blablabla without offering any real sympathy. So there are a few running around out there, but by far the minority.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

These hopes were quickly dashed in the course of Trump’s interview with the National Association of Black Journalists Wednesday afternoon, in which the candidate claimed that, for years, Vice President Kamala Harris “was Indian all the way, and then suddenly she made a turn and she became a Black person.”

Oh, so Trump is accusing her of what he is guilty of. He would change his ethnicity from Swedish to Irish to German depending on who was around.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I guess he’s free to say whatever the fuck he wants if his party think they’ve got the electoral votes rigged in their favor? https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-swing-state-officials-election-deniers-1235069692/

This is why he keeps saying “we don’t need the votes” at almost every rally

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Let me guess, the black genes are only 3/5 as powerful as her Indian genes?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

"we're hoping he doesn't act like a crazy racist and sexist person, we can't control him"

  • says person working for uncontrollable crazy racist and sexist person.
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 35 points 3 months ago

“As you can see, my opponent is a total fraud.

She even changed her name from Nikki to Kamala”

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

My guess is that his evangelical supporters see JD Vance as a betrayal creating a rift in the party between god bros and corporate/tech bros. He was depending on hatred of Biden to keep his groups aligned.

That and the dominion lawsuit tempered fox news so they can't parrot his most sensational claims.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

I think he desperately doesn't want her to get the black vote, so he's trying to tell everyone that she's not black. It's not going to work and it just makes him look like an idiot and bigot. And this is his best and most polite, practiced attempt. *Also half black Obama was black enough for him [pops popcorn].

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Here's what I don't get, regardless of if your black or indian, if you grew up in america with dark skin you likely have faced all the same struggles that any black voter would care about.

Edit: Assumptions got challenged, read replies.

So even if he was right (he's not, he's what physicists would call "not even wrong"), so what? Are racists any less racist to indians than african americans?

I don't get the playbook here, non-racists would just be confused and racists would still be racists.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Here’s what I don’t get, regardless of if your black or indian, if you grew up in america with dark skin you likely have faced all the same struggles that any black voter would care about.

No, that's very much not true, except maybe on a very superficial "some bigot called me a slur" kind of level. Indian-Americans are disproportionately wealthy and highly-educated; African-Americans are disproportionately the opposite. African-Americans have been subjected to institutional racism for centuries that is still ongoing because of the extreme wealth disparities it created (e.g. even after theoretically abolishing redlining decades ago, houses in black neighborhoods still don't appreciate in value at the same rate ones in white neighborhoods do... except when the neighborhood gentrifies and forces the black people out). Meanwhile, the bulk of Indian-Americans arrived after the Civil Rights Act, Fair Housing Act, etc. and had the means and opportunity to move straight into middle-class white neighborhoods and assimilate.

That's not to say that Indian-Americans don't face "struggles:" discrimination against Indian-American tech workers in particular is definitely a thing, especially motivated by a "the H1-Bs turk err jerbs" sentiment. (Meanwhile, Black engineers are treated either normally or at worst, as a curiosity, because there are so few of them to begin with. Pop quiz: why are there so few of them to begin with...?)

So, no: while it's true that all minorities are subject to discrimination, the type and extent of that discrimination varies greatly between different minority groups. The struggles are not the same.


Getting back to the real question you asked: the reason Trump wants to treat Harris as Indian, not Black, is to try to delegitimatize her in the eyes of Black voters as being some kind of elite that doesn't actually understand their struggle.

[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Huh, very valid points. I guess I was assuming casual racism that would come from only appearances and assumptions. But you are right that economic class heavily impacts the discrimination a person faces and that's specifically where african americans have been hit the hardest historically.

Thanks for providing more context.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jagermo 23 points 3 months ago

He's weird.

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

many GOP strategists, including in the Trump camp, worried that attacks on Harris’s race and gender […] would pose a serious liability for the campaign

Do they seriously understand their base that badly, or is this just optics? "I hope his completely unexpected racism doesn't alienate our voters who are totally not racist we swear this is so bad we're so worried oh no"

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago (9 children)

The base isn't going to be put off by it, but that's not who they're worried about. Every election is divided by independent swing voters and yes, some of them do care.

The 33% that constitutes Trump's base probably likes him more after every racist outburst, but they alone don't win national elections.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is Kamala isn't black, why does trump hate her so hard?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Recently, a major topic of discussion has been how fast the Democratic campaign went from weak to enthusiastic.

Stories like this one remind me how fast the Trump campaign went from scary to amusingly pathetic.

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Raccoons are much smaller than me. But I would be hesitant to corner one. Never underestimate the destructive capabilities of someone with poor priorities.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Could someone please return Trump's big balloon? It's about that big. Refer to the picture, about that size. Maybe a little smaller, maybe a little bigger. It could have been a beach balloon or ball.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

those in his party who consider racism a losing electoral strategy

I thought weaponized racism was literally a requirement for their party

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I was hoping for a throwback to “Obama isn’t black” where the image took a colourpicker to say Trump’s darker

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

What if ... maybe he got Harris mixed up with Nikki Haley? He got Haley and Pelosi mixed up before, and Haley was his most recent opponent, in the primaries. So it wouldn't be surprising he would say, "But she was always Indian before" if he was confused by the interviewers referring to Harris as Black while he was thinking of Haley. But he can't admit that so he has to double down.

That thought just now popped into my mind.

load more comments
view more: next ›