this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
188 points (93.1% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6434 readers
586 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was told by Lemmy comrades that Cuba has never done any wrong!

[–] nuke@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Land a plane with 56 soldiers to start invasion

56 soldiers dead

The VDV would be proud

[–] Shipgirlboy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

I think that's where they got their inspiration

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Saint Colonel Piotr would question them about the gap in their resume between landing and dying.

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And they were right to try. Trujillo was a monster.

Edit: and also the invasion catalyzed the assassination of Trujillo

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah, that's a nasty military failure, but the Cuban communists were not the bad guys in that period, relative to the other powers in Latin America. I don't actually know anything about Trujillo, but I bet I can make good guesses about what kind of leader he was.

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

He was said to have the best fed sharks in the Caribbean. Political dissidents had a tendency to disappear during his reign.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Didnt Che try the same bullshit in Colombia or something to similar effect?

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Wasn't Trujillo housing Batista and supporting his return to power?

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Aren't those abysmal numbers to attempt an invasion? Were they banking on overwhelming local support?

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Indeed they were. They overestimated it.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Well now I've got Millencolin stuck in my brain, so thanks for that.