this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
7 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4527 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Please back that up with enough money to more than offset Miriam Adelson

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

You can also use the Goods Unite Us app to do business with companies that donate to the democrat party

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

There's every indication that we'll see another huge mystery donation soon like Biden got last cycle.

Impetus has been quiet so far. But campaign finance experts have noticed stirrings. Earlier this month, after four years of operation, Impetus launched a website. Entering the campaign late, as it did in 2020, has advantages. If Impetus cranks up its fundraising later this summer, the dark money watch dogs will have nothing to chase until public filings are disclosed — after the election is over. Impetus did not respond to a request for comment.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-64-million-mystery-anonymous-donations-2024-presidential-campaign/

I.posted that article the other day, but it was so up voted I doubt anyone read it first.

Most speculate the money originated with a single, super-wealthy Biden supporter. But it could also have come from a privately held company or a shell corporation, an increasingly common tactic used by well-heeled donors seeking to add layers of anonymity to their political largesse. It remains a $64 million mystery — and while legal, it's one that critics say underscores what's wrong with today's campaign finance system.

"Without information about who is funding groups spending to influence elections, voters won't know who is trying to color their views, won't be aware of any potential conflicts of interest that a funder has or what stake they may have in the outcome of the election," said Anna Massoglia, editorial and investigations manager at OpenSecrets, a non-partisan watchdog organization that tracks the influence of money on politics.

Money isn't Biden's concern, votes are. Well, at least that should be.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can I get a show of hands on who cares what she thinks?

And I say that as someone who genuinely appreciates what she and her husband have done for charity.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

Anyone who knows that money is important to political campaigns in this country.

[–] hactar42@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just a reminder she was a big part of Microsoft Bob, which without we would not have comic sans. Not relevant to anything here, but an interesting footnote in her career.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago

Still a better UI experience than Vista

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

why is she Melinda French Gates now? it's not like anyone would suddenly not recognize the name Melinda Gates. Her name was on the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Going by Melinda French Gates seems like something one would do if there was already another Melinda Gates, and one needed to differentiate from them.

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Maybe she just wants to user her previous surname more now that she's divorced?

[–] 555@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That’s because she doesn’t hang out with child molesters like Trump and bill gates.

[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean..... she was married to one of those guys for over 2 decades

[–] 555@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And she got rid of him when she found out.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait, what? What's the context?

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

From her Wikipedia article:

According to The Wall Street Journal, Melinda Gates had been meeting with divorce lawyers since at least October 2019 after Bill's business dealings with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein became public, and she had warned him about associating with Epstein as early as 2013.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That's circumstantial evidence. I'm not saying Gates is a saint. It's just that no one has given me real proof of that claim.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You asked for context; not evidence.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You're right, friend. Thanks for the context.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

Why don't Child Rapists and Racists and Billionaires who kill Whistleblowers support Biden? CHECKMATE LIBRULS!