this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
398 points (98.1% liked)

World News

38500 readers
2699 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

G20 nations have agreed to work together to make the superrich pay their taxes, but stopped short of a broader agreement.

Finance ministers from the G20 nations agreed to work toward effectivelytaxing the superrich, according to a statement adopted Friday after a meeting in Rio de Janeiro.

"With full respect to tax sovereignty, we will seek to engage cooperatively to ensure that ultra-high-net-worth individuals are effectively taxed," the statement said.

"Wealth and income inequalities are undermining economic growth and social cohesion and aggravating social vulnerabilities," it added.

The sensitive issue of cracking down on tax-dodging billionaires dominated the two-day meeting in the Brazilian city that will host a G20 summit in November.

International Monetary Fund chief Kristalina Georgieva welcomed the G20's stance on "tax fairness," calling the decision to cooperate on taxing the ultrarich "timely and welcome."

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bungle_in_the_jungle@lemmy.world 72 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah I'll believe it when I bloody see it.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The problem, as ever, is game theory. All you need is ONE bad actor to spoil the entire effort. See the panama papers.

If one country has laws that allow billionaires to claim residence or establish a shell corporation and have lower or no income tax and these bastards will all jump at the chance and that tax money will slip through the fingers of everyone playing by the rules.

Laws are great. But what we need is real enforcement by agencies with real teeth. Ban shell corps. Tax overseas transfers aggressively. Treat white collar crime like a real crime with severe penalties.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

True, but that’s why groups like G20 exist. They can agree to act as a block. If a “bad actor” decided they wanted to do something like you suggest, the G20 countries could agree on sanctions against that country.

Also, “because someone will figure out a way around it” is not a good reason not to enact a law. Just a reason to make one better.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

Oh certainly. I wasn't suggesting not taking steps to improve the situation. But I'm advocating for each country (or perhaps even the G20 itself) establishing a similar set of rules, penalties, and aggressive enforcement. Anything else will leave loopholes and be a half-measure.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Incorrect, the US could unilaterally implement real tax reform and simply bar folks from doing business domestically (or having access to domestic services) and the rich assholes would start paying up really quick... then other countries would have the choice of leaving money on the table and being a tax haven or getting free money.

The real fucking problem is political donations. Countries make less revenue but politicians are getting fat stacks.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

I'll believe it when it happens

[–] late_night@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 month ago

Dear god what's with the shading on that sign

[–] thegr8goldfish@startrek.website 13 points 1 month ago

Now do the corporations.

[–] LastJudgement@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good news!

I heavily disagree with the shading on the picture tho, what the hell is that

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Must be on purpose, because it's what caught my eye to click on this post lol

It is truly awful

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

They also agreed to fight climate change. We know how well that turned out.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Stopped short of a broad agreement.

Yeah nothing changes

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 8 points 1 month ago

Watchmen agrees to watch itself.

[–] xiao@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago
[–] FrankLaskey@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Furiously hammers X to doubt

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 1 month ago

any country can do it. Require taxes based on their their global earnings/profits and allow them to deduct any taxes they pay to other countries.