this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

32290 readers
548 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

“When I came to this bureau ... I knew it was not without its moral complexity and moral compromises, and I made myself a promise that I would stay for as long as I felt … the harm I might do could be outweighed by the good I could do,” Paul wrote on LinkedIn. “In my 11 years I have made more moral compromises than I can recall, each heavily, but each with my promise to myself in mind, and intact. I am leaving today because I believe that in our current course with regards to the continued – indeed, expanded and expedited – provision of lethal arms to Israel – I have reached the end of that bargain.”

Gutty. Well thanks for trying to change things from the inside, it's a shame things are set up the way they are. Not to mention having the strength to stick to your morals and leave when you realize there's no more good you can do.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dunno. It sounds like he was a state-sponsored arms dealer. Was he really "doing good?"

[–] Ropianos@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It does sound a bit weird. On the other hand, if he can influence the choices positively, he does have a point. If not him, someone else would take the job. I would have drawn the line somewhere else but I can understand where he is coming from.

And the fact that he resigned means that he has and likely had some moral compass guiding him.