this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

32075 readers
969 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

“When I came to this bureau ... I knew it was not without its moral complexity and moral compromises, and I made myself a promise that I would stay for as long as I felt … the harm I might do could be outweighed by the good I could do,” Paul wrote on LinkedIn. “In my 11 years I have made more moral compromises than I can recall, each heavily, but each with my promise to myself in mind, and intact. I am leaving today because I believe that in our current course with regards to the continued – indeed, expanded and expedited – provision of lethal arms to Israel – I have reached the end of that bargain.”

Gutty. Well thanks for trying to change things from the inside, it's a shame things are set up the way they are. Not to mention having the strength to stick to your morals and leave when you realize there's no more good you can do.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I dunno. It sounds like he was a state-sponsored arms dealer. Was he really "doing good?"

[–] Ropianos@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It does sound a bit weird. On the other hand, if he can influence the choices positively, he does have a point. If not him, someone else would take the job. I would have drawn the line somewhere else but I can understand where he is coming from.

And the fact that he resigned means that he has and likely had some moral compass guiding him.