this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

58083 readers
3104 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We cannot lower carbon emissions if we keep producing steel with fossil fuels.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

How else do u suppose we make steel?

[–] hahattpro@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

what about giving up on steel and moving into something more 'vintage', like clay @_@

[–] pumpkinseedoil@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago

That's fundamentally different from steel. We don't really have an alternative currently. You could use something like aluminium but that's not environmentally friendly either (in the initial production, for recycling it's great).

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Use renewable and clean energy sources to produce electricity then make steel with induction heater or other forms of electricity-based heat?

[–] pumpkinseedoil@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Coal is required for steel, electricty-based heat would only work to lower carbon emissions (especially when recycling steel since you don't need coal there), but you couldn't prevent them.

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago

"... Only work to lower carbon emissions" But thats exactly the point, that it is high emissions now.