this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

23258 readers
2796 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)
[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Gardening has its own associated costs with supplies and requires space

It's the cost of supplies and garden maintenance and see requirement vs the cost of food at the supermarket

It needs to cost less than the growable food you can buy at the store

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You can get away with very little supplies, actually. Basically just a small shovel, the rest be salvaged.

Pots can be made from old plastic bins/containers, soil/fertilizer can be made from food waste using worms, seeds can be made from surprisingly many fruits/vegetables. Pumpkin seeds are right inside the pumpkin, potatoes and beans can be put right into the soil, even tomatoes can be grown from store bought ones.

And while it's a really cool hobby: you're right regarding the cost effectiveness. Unless you happen to have a significant plot of land, it won't make a dent in your grocery bill.

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Plastic can leech plastic into your food, I know this personally from getting headaches from using soda bottles as water bottles

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And my aunt gets headaches from 5G.

You're not getting headaches from water bottles. It's placebo (or nocebo, in this case).

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Toxic effects of plastic on human health and environment: A consequences of health risk assessment in Bangladesh

Ram Proshad, Tapos Kormoker, Md Saiful Islam, Mohammad Asadul Haque, Md Mahfuzur Rahman, Md Mahabubur Rahman Mithu

International Journal of Health 6 (1), 1-5, 2018

Plastics are used widely everywhere in our life and without plastic, modern civilization would indeed look very diverse. This study focuses on the toxic effects of plastic on human health and environment and possible consequences of health risk assessment in Bangladesh. Plastics are essential materials in modern civilization, and many products manufactured from plastics and in numerous cases, they promote risks to human health and the environment. Plastics are contained many chemical and hazardous substances such as Bisphenol A (BPA), thalates, antiminitroxide, brominated flame retardants, and poly-fluorinated chemicals etc. which are a serious risk factor for human health and environment. Plastics are being used by Bangladeshi people without knowing the toxic effects of plastic on human health and environment. Different human health problems like irritation in the eye, vision failure, breathing difficulties, respiratory problems, liver dysfunction, cancers, skin diseases, lungs problems, headache, dizziness, birth effect, reproductive, cardiovascular, genotoxic, and gastrointestinal causes for using toxic plastics. Plastics occur serious environment pollution such as soil pollution, water pollution, and air pollution. Application of proper rules and regulations for the production and use of plastics can reduce toxic effects of plastics on human health and environment.

https://www.comfortncolor.com/HTML/Polystyrene_Styrene%20Ban/Toxic%20of%20Plastic/2018_Toxic_effects_of_plastic_on_human_health.pdf

This is just a paper citing plastics affects on health in Bangladesh but it does demonstrate that plastic can have these effects

You are wrongly comparing scientifically proven effects of plastic with misinformation

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago

Nope, you're simply wildly exaggerating the effects of the dosage you're actually getting.

That's like saying water causes cancer, because everyone with cancer drank water at some point.

You are not getting the minimum doses needed to get from a water bottle. And again, if you're getting headaches from a water bottle, that's your imagination. Period.

[–] fuckthepolice@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is not great advice. Using random crap for planters can leech chemicals into your fruits and veggies. Also, you need seed-potatoes to grow potatoes you can eat. You cannot grow edible potatoes from what you buy in a grocery store.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago

"Random crap" is what's used in agriculture as well, if you buy a big plastic tub, it won't leech more into the soil than your coke bottle already did. There's only so much plastic that can leech out and planters can be used for years, the plastic you're using around your house gets thrown out in a week or two and replaced. Much higher chemical content there.

And you can absolutely use store bought potatoes, they are clones, there's no difference between seed and regular potatoes. At most, there might have been something done to prevent sprouting for a bit, but that's it. You can simply wait for them to sprout, if that's a concern. You know how I know? I've been growing "old" food potatoes in pots for years. Works just fine.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

While I like gardening, unironically advising people to grow their own food to cut costs is just bonkers.

It takes months to grow anything, and given the limited space, you can't grow much anyway. You'll be lucky to grow 20€ worth of food on your balcony while spending hours doing the gardening. That's not cost effective.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And that doesn't even count the cost of materials to get started.

Definitely not against gardening, me and my partners are in the process of getting our garden going in our new place, but dirt alone could easily eat up the cost savings if you have to build out your planters.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago

As I wrote in another comment: you can create your own soil with earthworms. You can get a small batch of worms in fishing supply stores for like 5€ (or collect them yourself), these guys turn almost any plant material into pure fertilizer.

[–] Pavidus@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do we REALLY need to quiz people to know this? Ffs.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If we could afford housing, then that would be it.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Y’all

Rich = Full Time Employed?

You seem to mistake having a salary for having money.

America now has more than 6,000 Zoomer chief executives and 1,000 Zoomer politicians.

Also, what if you're not a CEO or a politician? Also, plus, too, how on earth is "small town city councilman" or "part-time New Hampshire legislator" a sign of wealth?

[–] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I don't get the point you're trying to make with your graph. Obviously there wouldn't be many Zoomers working full time; most are still in school.

Zoomers born after 2006 haven't graduated high-school, and those born between 2002-2006 are in college. That's leaves only a 5 year window of people you'd expect to be employed full time.

The line for millenials looks about the same as Zoomers.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The line for millenials looks about the same as Zoomers.

shrug

Take that up with the Economist, its their claim and their chart.

[–] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm trying to understand your argument against the article and what point you're trying to make by using their chart.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

The data in the article doesn't support the headline.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That was one single indicator. I agree it's not the best, to your point, unemployment, homeownership, and salary averages are the ones that show middle class wealth.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

I don't see any of that in the article. Is it hidden behind the paywall?

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As they're living with their parents because they can't afford an apartment of their own.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is a serious point. I couldn’t afford a place until I was in a relationship. And that was a long time ago. I can’t imagine how difficult it would be with today’s rent.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Having a roommate turned an apartment from unaffordable luxury to merely 25% of my paycheck.

I honestly think having roommates is fun, particularly if you're old friends anyway. But its crazy that a spot at the ass end of town was eating so much of my take home pay even after we cut the bill in half.

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Don't worry though we solved inflation. We just removed it from our calculations. If we don't count it: it's not there!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Investment funds stocking up on US farmland in safe-haven bet

Investment funds have become voracious buyers of U.S. farmland, amassing over a million acres as they seek a hedge against inflation and aim to benefit from the growing global demand for food, according to data reviewed by Reuters and interviews with fund executives.

The trend worries some U.S. lawmakers who fear corporate interest will make agricultural land unaffordable for the next generation of farmers. Those lawmakers are floating a bill in Congress that would impose restrictions on the industry’s purchases.

Though their acreage is a small slice of the nearly 900 million acres of U.S. farmland, the pace of acquisitions by investment firms like Manulife Investment Management and Nuveen has quickened since the 2008 global financial crisis drove firms to seek new investment vehicles, according to Reuters interviews with fund managers and an analysis of data from the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF).

The number of properties owned by such firms increased 231% between 2008 and the second quarter of 2023, and the value of those holdings rose more than 800% to around $16.2 billion, according to NCREIF's quarterly farmland index, which tracks the holdings of the seven largest firms in farmland investment.

Farmland offers steady returns even in periods of high inflation, and firms hope crop demand will remain steady as the United Nations predicts the world will need 60% more food by 2050 due to population growth.

You don't want to confuse "inflation" with "economic growth". One makes prices go up because the evil bad salaries are increasing. But the other makes profits go up because of the smart efficient business net revenues are increasing.

A prosperous nation needs big new investments in the future. And that means speculating in our domestic breadbasket, so we can maximize the price of inelastic commodities in an effort to optimize consumption habits. You don't like waste, do you? Optimizing price reduces waste. Its all right here in the book Basic Economics by totally non-problematic and very smart guy Thomas Sowell.