this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
198 points (98.5% liked)

News

29076 readers
4539 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 114 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Sens. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., who voiced support for the measure, were absent for the vote. It needed a simple majority to pass.

Rotating. Villains. And the "same, logical" voices want to block/report our voices here because we vote/advocate third parties.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

How were they absent for the vote? They better have a good reason.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 34 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Because how voting currently works in the US no third party candidate would/has get close to winning.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 34 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

We all know about the evils of first past the post here, but voting blue doesn't. Fucking. Work.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 7 points 5 hours ago

Didn't say it did work. I'm not presenting a solution here, I'm not the messiah.

For a problem like what the US currently has, IMO they're kind of past the point where voting alone is going to solve it. They needed to change their voting system before an authoritarian despot took control. Hopefully they'll remember this when trying to piece some sort of new government back together once he's gone.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The thing that works the least is shitting in the pool, which is what voting third party is.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 3 hours ago

Voting alone was never going to work. Organize then we can talk about whether voting third party makes sense or not.

[–] known_unknown@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

A rep from a Alaska introduced a bill that would attempt to make ranked choice voting illegal 🫠 just open tyranny

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 6 points 8 hours ago

ms palin lost due to rank choiced voting.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

no we dislike you because you helped elect trump and that was clearly your intent.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 7 hours ago
[–] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 18 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Buy the ticket, take the ride!

[–] SculptusPoe@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Wish HST was here for the commentary.

[–] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

Pretty sure he would look at today's world and go, "I made the right choice"

[–] dan@upvote.au 6 points 8 hours ago

Even if it passed, that's not going to stop Trump from doing what he wants.

[–] threeduck@aussie.zone -5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Ehh, good. The more Americans are bailed out, the less they suffer the consequences of their actions.

May the complacency of the left and the idiocy of the right reap their fullest rewards.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 25 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

the complacency of the left

I have to assume you're using "left" in that peculiar American sense in which it means "center right". The actual left are not complacent, but they're unrepresented.

[–] AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

when i start talking politics with people, i regularly have to preface the conversation with "i am an extreme outlier that is very far left" because i get very weird looks for saying things like, "all people should be able to eat."

its a weird state of being trying to defend something kind.

[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Preaching kindness is a dangerous business. Be careful out there.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The actual left is very much also complacent. Mango man's goons just robbed an innocent family (of citizens, though I shouldn't need to specify that) blind and where's the action? Where's the outrage? Where are the goddamn strikes?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Where are the goddamn strikes?

I think that's lack of organization, given how difficult companies have made it for workers to unionize, rather than lack of will. Also lack of numbers, given how many workers have become Trumpists or consider unions to be evil communism.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 4 hours ago

Yeah so the actual left should be doing something about that right the fuck now. Anything else is complacency.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

i cast itchy lower back upon you