this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

58009 readers
2968 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] loics2@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I really wanted to like tidal, but honestly it's not really good. The search sucks, no offline mode on desktop, no official Linux client, an incomplete catalog...

It's not worth it, even if they are the least bad for paying artists.

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

honestly it’s not really good

*for you it isn't

the search sucks

what's wrong with it? works fine for me

no offline mode on desktop

why would you need it? it's supported on phones, just listen via phone?

no official Linux client

Neither does apple music. Tidal are open sourcing their SDK though

an incomplete catalog

*for you. for me there isn't

It’s not worth it, even if they are the least bad for paying artists

Again, for you. On paper, tidal is the better option and I rather support artists than some questionable monopolistic corporation

[–] tutus@links.hackliberty.org 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is perhaps the stupidest response I've read on Lemmy for a while. Nobody is entitled to an opinion these days.

Im expecting a response, quoting each paragraph I wrote, with only 'For you' as the text.

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I don't agree. He wrote it like it was absolute, whereas it's a personal opinion. Like you stated correctly.

[–] SitD@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

well it's neither nor. I'm also pissed that there's no Linux client, and they didn't even try to make their windows client run in wine. so it's not just one person's opinion as i hereby confirm.

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not saying it's not a valid point against tidal overall. I would also enjoy me a linux native client. However I don't see why this is a valid point against tidal and for apple music.

Having said that. I found a bug in their windows client and the devs are very much receptive for feedback. Maybe in the future when more people use Linux they'll come around and make one. Or the community will with tidal's open source SDK.

[–] GeekySalsa@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why do you keep mentioning apple music? OP never made any comparison to it or any other streaming service. He just communicated why the service didn't work for him and you felt compelled to inform him that how he feels is his opinion?

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You're missing the point I'm trying to make. He's stating his opinion, which his absolutely valid for him, but concludes that in general it's not worth it and that it is not good. The only thing I did was mark his opinions, also mark my opinions, but conclude that in the general case there's no better option. I only wanted to draw attention to this style of rhetoric which I don't like as a discussion culture.

Btw I also don't like the ad homimen argument e.g. "stupidest comment I've seen" etc. That's not how a respectful discussion should be.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

no offline mode on desktop

why would you need it? it's supported on phones, just listen via phone?

So you're saying this use case works for you??

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago
[–] loics2@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Damn, you're shilling hard!

I don't want to use my phone for basic features like the offline mode, I'm not always connected to the internet on my laptop, that's it.

I don't care about Apple music, and almost every streaming platform provides some kind of SDK. It doesn't change the fact that I don't have a Linux client, and probably never will (or at least feature-complete) because they partly use Dolby Atmos, which is a closed-source licensed format.

And no, even on paper, tidal's not the better option to support artists. Buy tracks on Bandcamp, buy merch and vinyl directly from artists...

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'm talking in the context of streaming services here...

Maybe you're right with the Linux client part, but I don't know any other streaming service that does provide one? At least Spotify and Apple Music don't. Does it make them also not worth it? I would disagree.

I never said tidal is the best app to support artists. In that regard there is a better option, just give them your money for free. I meant as a streaming service, quality wise and in terms of paying artists, there are no better options.

What I didn't like about your OP was the fact that you laid your personal opinions out and then concluded that tidal is not worth it. Doesn't make me a shill when I answer with counterpoints.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Your counterpoints were all basically just "your use case is different than mine therefore you are wrong".

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

No not at all

[–] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

At least Spotify and Apple Music don't

Spotify does have an application for Linux, if you're gonna harp on about facts you should at least stick to them.

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

Point taken, guess I remembered it wrong. But if you take a look at the arch wiki, they say that your mentioned client is actually not official.

This article is mainly about the semi-official, proprietary Spotify for Linux client, which is developed by Spotify's engineers in their spare time and not actively supported by Spotify.

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why would you waste your own time with a comment like this?

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean? I'm interested in his opinion and he wrote it like it was an absolute fact. Poor way to start a discussion imo.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's his opinion, that's the fact for him. How obtuse do you have to be to waste your time like that?

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

I'm not arguing against his personal opinions, I'm arguing against his conclusion that tidal is not worth it (for everyone,because that is how it is worded).

How is it of your concern how I spend my time?

[–] ardi60@reddthat.com 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Spotify vs Tidal vs Apple Music vs Youtube Music which one is better?

[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I spent a few months with each of them recently.

For me, Apple Music recommendations are by far the best. Tidal was decent but the UI was a pain and the integrations didn’t work well. Spotify had great integrations and easy device switching, but the recommendations were terrible, for me. YouTube music is the worst of the batch. Bad UI, bad recommendations, and just not a music lovers platform.

So, I use Apple Music. For me, it is the best since the GOAT Google Play Music was retired.

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

Interesting. For me, none of any recommendation algorithm worked decently well for me. I find new bands via following other bands (on Instagram, sadly), look at what they listen to, what bands they hang/tour/do concerts with or by asking other punks or by checking other communities.

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Tidal is the most popular option for audiophiles. What I also like about it is the fact that they pay artists much more fairly than other platforms. According to this, they payout $0.013 per stream on average (which means $1 per 77 streams). Because I listen to a lot of unknown artists it is important to me to be on a platform where I can support those artists much more directly.

AFAIK Spotify only pays the overall most listened to artists like Taylor Swift etc. I canceled my Spotify subscription when Neil Young quit Spotify.

EDIT: because this is becoming a bit popular, for anyone looking to migrate from Spotify to Tidal, I recommend this simple to use python script to migrate your playlists. And because we have a lot of Linux users here, check out tidal-hifi.

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Tidal may be most popular but the use of the lossy MQA codec for their "lossless" offerings is objectively worse than Deezer, Apple music and even Amazon Music.

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Good thing they are migrating to FLAC! Also, while MQA is objectively worse, subjectively it's pretty much equal to objectively better options. At least for us humans :) I found this double-blind test of MQA critic Archimago and they couldn't find a statistically significant difference between MQA and PCM :)

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is Neil on Tidal? I know he is in QoBuz.

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

He is! ~~And I think he returned to Spotify as well.~~ Nope, still off.

[–] kriz@slrpnk.net 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm thinking of switching to Tidal. I've had YouTube music for awhile and I like it, but I just learned they fired a huge chunk of their staff after they unionized and that pissed me off. Anybody know how their rock and jazz selection is, especially with smaller lesser known artists?

[–] jul@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I mainly listen to punk and it's extremely hard to find bands that are not on Tidal. When I migrated my playlists to Tidal from Spotify, there was only 1 Band which didn't exist on Tidal. But because it was only 1 song that was part of one of my playlists, I simply didn't care. ~~I don't even remember which one it was.~~ Aha, they're called Valentiine (3 piece all-girl garage rock band from Melbourne, Australia) and they're still not on Tidal. Still don't care.

Can't speak for Jazz though.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's a pretty good price, if YT music ever takes away my $8 a month early sign up pricing I'll probably look at swapping over.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

Who uses YT music when there are so many free clients?