this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
123 points (98.4% liked)

News

23310 readers
3500 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
JonsJava@lemmy.world
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
123
Missouri politicians put a trick measure on the November ballot to silence your voice (www.kansascity.com)
submitted 4 months ago by nulluser@programming.dev to c/news@lemmy.world
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 59 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This year, the Missouri General Assembly passed a deceptive measure that could actually make it harder for us to hold our leaders accountable. You will see this measure on your November ballot, claiming that it stops noncitizens from voting — even though that has been illegal for a century. It’s an unnecessary and misleading proposal, but without Missourians reading the fine print, it may very well pass — based on a lie.

One of the simplest examples is called “pick-all-you-like” or approval voting: When voters go to the ballots, they can choose any number of candidates they support, rather than being forced to settle on one option.

Unfortunately, the legislature’s trick measure in November would take away your choice to hold leaders accountable by hiding what’s really on the ballot. It’s a deceptive attack on local control.

I'm a fleshy human being who took out some quotes manually.

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Thank you mr Fleshy. Don't you think multiple ranked choice is a better voting mechanism?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's my preferred, however, almost anything that moves away from the one-choice, winner-takes-all design is an easy win IMHO.

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So why was it presented as a voting manipulation? Is it deception?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 4 months ago

The deception is that the item presented for vote appears to be about illegal voting of non-citizens, but this isn’t related to the actual law being voted upon.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's why I don't like you mammals! You're all... fleshy.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I was born ready to go full cyborg. I am not impressed with the meat.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel, I aspired to the purity of the blessed machine

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago (2 children)

So it either bans or revokes existing ranked choice balloting? It's unclear from the article if they already have it, and this removes it, or if it's an attempt to ban it before it even gets started.

[–] otter@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 months ago

The only current think close to ranked choice voting in the state that I'm aware of is in St. Louis City where a few positions are elected based on a double run off where the top two candidates of the first election have a subsequent run off.

I read an article a little bit back where the politician championing it was quoted saying "it's too confusing" and that is the primary reason it needs to be banned in the state constitution. So that's the kind of people trying to push this through.

What I believe they really want is to clamp down on any chance of local municipalities trying to use an alternative voting system to first past the post. Those in power would be threatened by people having more choice.

[–] alilbee@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

If they already had ranked choice, I doubt this would be on the ballot.

[–] lemmyman@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Link was paywalled for me and I could not make sense of the posted excerpt.

Ballotpedia link

Tldr the measure bundles citizenship language (change from "all" citizens to "only" citizens can vote) and a RCV ban - among other things - into one constitutional amendment.