this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
10 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5173 readers
1018 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] powerofm@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago (23 children)

I think this sends a much stronger message than stone henge

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago

Almost as if when you target the problem it sends a better message than doing some random shit.

[–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 months ago

The fact that most comments here seem to be talking about stone henge says otherwise. If not for what happened to stone henge recently, people might not have paid this much attention to this.

So close together? Probably not. Look at the comments. everyone is just talking about Stonehenge.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

And that's the kind of protest that people get behind.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

They leveled up today.

[–] muppeth@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 4 months ago

Finally a great action from those folks!made my day.

[–] solarbabies@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Great stuff! Disappointing that the article didn't mention how they managed to get on the tarmac.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There's usually nothing more than a chain-link fence.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah, but you get instantly get 5 stars

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Hear me out. Why don't we spray StoneHenge on the private jets ? one stone at a time, with old fashioned trebuchets

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wait a minute, that doesn't sound like painting at all!

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

No one ever said you can't paint with a trebuchet. Sounds very artistic

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Wait until they find out how much it's going to cost them to repaint the jets that they vandalized.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (20 children)

Yeah, this I can get behind. Fuck those guys painting Stonehenge, but this? Yeah, go ahead.

[–] k110111@feddit.de 4 points 4 months ago (13 children)

Controversial opinion: whats the point of stonehenge if there is no humanity? Its not like it fosters some ecosystem or smth for other species, its a historical piece which holds sentimental value to us humans.

If we continue to use oil, we will for sure fuck up humanity. The act was controversial but the message needs to be looked at

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah but that is the problem. These people keep on trying to destroy art and historical sites just to get the point across.

I know the point, we all know the point and there is NOTHING we can do about it. It's ll in the hands of politicians and wealthy assholes. Destroying beautiful things or historical artifacts isn't doing anything to further the cause, it's not doing a single shit to teach humanity (or better, those politicians that actually can stop climate change). It's the same as those protests that stop traffic. You only piss people off and cause ambulances to not arrive in time at hospitals.

You're doing it wrong.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

With that attitude we can just about go ahead and kill ourselves, what's the point, right?

My point is that trying to destroy stonge henge and art just to get attention to your cause is doing the cause a disservice. If anything it gives oil producers ammonto say "see how idiotic they are? They don't know what they're doing, climate change isnt real"

Stop punishing all of humanity for what is caused and controlled by a select few. Destroy rich assholes airplanes, that I can get behind. Leave art and historical sites alone.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (6 children)

The guys doing Stonehenge at least tried. They used a powder they thought would just come off in the rain.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›