this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
243 points (92.0% liked)

Palestine

125 readers
9 users here now

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 110 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I support Anonymous on this. Three cheers for them.

[–] Aquila@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ballsy AF. Those hackers are gonna have Mossad chasing them the rest of their lives

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago

Still probably a longer life than the people in Palestine getting herded into areas and then bombed.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago

With any luck, Israel won't have an endless runway of cash to fund their armed forces forever.

[–] x4740N@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

I also support Anonymous on this

[–] dan42O@infosec.pub 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] loki@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

crickets

I mean I hope they stop, but they didn't stop with all the bad publicity already, what's another setback.

[–] DmMacniel 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, it's an unofficial 'group' so there's no reason at all that these are even the same people who have used the name before.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It is official it's just that it's membership and leadership isn't.

Anonymous is basically just a mask for greyhats to operate under when attacking targets who can backlash more specific groups.

Would not be surprised at all if some anonymous hacks were committed by already known hacker collectives who knew they had something big but wanted to avoid retaliation.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

greyhats

I prefer the term "hacker activists" which can include blackhats, greyhats, and sometimes whitehats that get angry enough that, even if they do not actively participate in an attack, they can provide resources of all sorts.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I distinguish Blackhat and Greyhat along the morality of the act itself, rule breaking for noble cause is grey, and for selfish cause is black.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And you'd be correct. Also a white hat is someone who is usually paid by an org to pen test them https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_hat_(computer_security).

If, outside of what they normally apply their hacking abilities to they are participating in this, they are all grey hats on this blessed day

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's Edward Hopper painting characters in grey trench coats all the way down!

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah my thought just went to the Gandalf epic sax guy in a rendering lab meme, but I’m a child of the internet

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=asjQNZn7vng

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

lol the second lab

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Not hacktavists? One of the few portmanteaus that don't drive me crazy :)

[–] match@pawb.social 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is there any difference between "the hacker group Anonymous" and "an anonymous hacker group" now?

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah, whether anonymous puts a statement out taking credit

[–] marzhall@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

There never was, all the way back to day one. Any given "operation" may or may not have overlapped in membership. The name is literal, and always has been; but with it comes a set of meanings and tropes (the mask, "we will not forgive, we will not forget, we are legion") that a given actor taking the name can invoke as a call to action for others, or use to simply mask their identity.

[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 month ago

They're almost certainly a sock puppet for state actors most of the time.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)