this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
24 points (90.0% liked)

movies

3675 readers
252 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreyShuck@feddit.uk 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Beautifully shot and some fine performances all round. Very much a character-based one though. Don't go into it looking for action or fast-moving plot.

[–] Blaze 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] modeler@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It was a surprisingly good drama, but I felt the ending was a bit formulaic.

The Catholic/Papal setting is technically central to the film, and provides amazing visuals, but, like many good films, the movie is centred on interesting characters and their personal struggles. The movie could be rewritten to place it in any organisation and it would still be great. I say this not to downplay the religious angle, but to highlight that you don't have to be Catholic to enjoy it.

Having said that, the lead actors' performances are amazing and work wonderfully together.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

End was odd. Such a good mystery and intrigue movie and the end just wasn't. I dislike "out of the blue" things you can't see coming.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

See, if you do have a bit of knowledge on current catholic church politics and pick up of some clues early on in the movie you can definitely see the ending coming. It's not unguessable.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Which part of the ending can you see coming? The person who ends up being pope, I predicted based purely on narrative structure right from the beginning. The twist after he becomes pope? I never would have called it, so I'd love to know what the early clues are to that.

Personally, I wouldn't have minded the ending if it hadn't felt so rushed.

SpoilersGoing from the Mexican guy having like 5 votes in the previous vote to the bombing and his relatively under-written speech (to its credit!), to suddenly he wins the next vote. I had expected him to have a very good showing in the next vote, then some more politicking, and then win a final vote. Had they gone for a bigger speech in that theatre, and risked over-writing it, maybe then his sudden win would have felt more earnt. But the way they went with it felt incredibly rushed.

Once the twist of him being intersex was revealed, I had expecting to see some fallout of that in the denouement. Instead, there just...wasn't a denouement. Which just added to how rushed it all felt.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah the person was predictable based on the narrative structure.

Regarding the final twist

Iirc Lawrence gets tipped off at some point about Benitez' secretive, papal-approved medical treatment that he then cancelled instead of going through with it. I kept thinking about what it could be, and while I didn't predict the twist completely my mind did wander into that direction. Mainly because it became quite clear to me that this story would pull every possible scenario that a conclave could have, and with the current church discussions regarding the role of women I thought he would turn out to be trans. Which I'm happy they did not do and rather chose a much much more believable and realistic story of a biological inter person who doesn't even find out he's not biological male for decades.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ah interesting. I noticed those hints, but thought they were going in a different direction.

SpoilersGiven all the talk about other bishop's illicit personal relationships, I was wondering if he had gotten a woman pregnant and she then got an abortion.

But I agree with you strongly re trans vs intersex. It would have been much less believable for the Catholic Church to embrace, even unknowingly, an AFAB trans man as pope than AMAB intersex.

I'd push back a bit at your characterisation of him as "not biological male" though. Intersex people like Benitez do a good job of demonstrating why exactly the position held by some people (especially transphobes trying to make a biological deterministic argument) that even if gender might be complicated, sex is a binary, is untrue. Between chromosomes, gonads, genitals, gametes produced, hormones produced, hormone receptors, and secondary sexual characteristics, it's pretty clear that sex is too complicated to accurately talk about whether someone actually "is" or is not male. We know explicitly that he had female gonads, male genitals, and male secondary sexual characteristics. Which certainly implies a more male-like hormone production and/or reception. Personally I wouldn't say that Benitez "is a biological male", but nor would I confidently assert that he "isn't a biological male".

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

spoilerAbsolutely, my phrasing in calling him "not biologically male" was due to me not speaking English as a first language and not being sure how to phrase it correctly

[–] modeler@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I agree that the end is not unguessable, but it's pure wish fulfillment, and it's not earned by the characters involved.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

Ah, yes that's true.

[–] Ilandar@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah the ending is perfectly fine in theory, there just isn't enough dedicated to it throughout the rest of the film for it to work effectively. I haven't read the novel so I wonder if that did a better job in this regard.

[–] modeler@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I agree, completely unearned. My headcanon has the movie end quite differently and more satisfactorily (but I won't give spoilers).

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I had it on my watchlist but couldn't bring myself to watch it because the subject matter sounded dull but a good friend recommended I watch it so I pulled the trigger. No regrets. Way better than I was expecting.

[–] Ilandar@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

I agree with others that the ending fails to live up to the rest of the film, but I still think it's worth watching because the other 90%+ is excellent political thriller type stuff.

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Loved it so much I'm subscribed to the conclave hash tags on tumblr just to save more screen grabs

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 4 points 2 weeks ago

Strong central performances save a plot with some pretty contrived plot developments. Worth a watch but you have to suspend belief. So a lot like the Church.

[–] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

TL;DR: Very well made, but shallow and lacking in substance.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

I only watch a handful of new movies a year. Usually prefer to go back and watch old movies I’ve never seen before. Yet I really enjoyed this one.

[–] froggycar360@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

I loved it!