this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
81 points (93.5% liked)

New York Times gift articles

500 readers
1 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Harris has been endorsed enthusiastically by the candidates who would be her challengers. She just needs to make a smart VP pick. It will set the tone for trusting her judgment.

I personally think Andy Beshear is the right choice. He can appeal to Republicans who care about decency and country over party. That’s enough votes to win the swing states.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Does nobody else see the problem with "donors flocking"?

Yet again, oligarchs and the absurdly wealthy are buying influence, and it gets ignored

[–] maniii@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right now, any candidate that gets people motivated enough to get to the polls and not "pokemon Go to the polls" has to be good enough to keep Drumpf out of the oval office.

Its sad to see the "bots" and "farms" existing on both sides. Propaganda is good for one thing, brainwashing and disenfranchising the masses.

DNC and democracy are always for sale and this time around is no different in that.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yesh, well as true as that is, maybe it's time we stop accepting the status quo. The more of this shit I see, the more militant I start thinking.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maybe we worry more about not electing a Nazi, and take care of the rest of it after that.

Priorities people

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago

I mean, in a revolution, I would hazard a guess that not electing the nazi would cease to be an issue.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There will always be another Nazi, because Republicans are a fascist party.

If the Democrats want me to accept being in a one-sided Popular Front coalition for life they can acknowledge that reality, and stop doing fascist shit themselves.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh, so I guess we should just give up and let the Nazis win then.

Flawless logic — that same ol’ both sides bullshit

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Right. Also, does nobody see the problem with the fact that delegates are pledging without any sort of vote from the people? The oligarchs have chosen two whole people out of 330 million, and told us that it's democracy when we get to pick one of them, and one of them has sworn to destroy the country. This is not a government of the people, by the people, for the people.

[–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I agree with you in part. But I'm sure common folks are also a good portion of the donors.

Actually, let's find out...

Ok. This is from 2020, so I'm not sure how good it reflects 2024:

https://www.opensecrets.org/2020-presidential-race/kamala-harris/demographics?id=N00036915

It says that women were the majority donating, and the biggest group donated between $1,000 and $3,000 - still a lot of money for many common folk, but that's far from the "oligarchs" that you guys are talking about.

[–] aleph@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It doesn't get ignored; it's one of the most common criticisms of US politics.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I meant more on this level than the world stage.

Plenty of posts about the candidacy change, but very few issues taken with the fact that there were huge donors pledging to not donate without a change in candidate, and woopsie-doodle, now you've got money flowing again.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

That's how it is in US politics. There's only a choice between the insane horror clown and the corporate stooge. Shitty choice but an easy one nonetheless.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Ms. Harris tapped former Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who once oversaw Barack Obama’s vice-presidential vetting, to oversee her choice of a potential running mate, according to two people briefed on the matter.

Two of Ms. Harris’s top political advisers, Sheila Nix and Brian Fallon, joined the Monday morning call of senior staff members on the Biden-turned-Harris campaign — a sign of her team’s widening footprint inside the operation.

The next step in the party’s formal nomination of Ms. Harris will come on Wednesday, when the rules committee of the Democratic National Convention is scheduled to meet to set a date for a virtual roll-call vote of the state delegations.

Any momentum toward a competitive nominating contest appeared to melt away early Monday when a half-dozen Democratic governors quickly fell into line behind Ms. Harris — among them Andy Beshear of Kentucky, JB Pritzker of Illinois, Wes Moore of Maryland and Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan.

Democrats were delighted by the jolt of energy, with donors flocking to give after Mr. Biden’s exit: The Harris campaign announced on Monday that it had raised $81 million in her first 24 hours, a record sum, from 888,000 unique contributors.

Tim Walz of Minnesota was due for a round of cable TV interviews on Monday night and Tuesday morning, during which he planned to explain the party’s nominating process and promote his own political biography.


The original article contains 1,682 words, the summary contains 232 words. Saved 86%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

A woman for the time.