this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

25324 readers
1966 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The main reasons I've seen from vegans for not eating meat seem to be all about the morality of eating a sentient animal, the practices of the modern meat industry, and the environmental impact of it. And don't have anything to do with the taste of meat.

Since lab-grown meat doesn't cause animal suffering, and assuming mass production is environmentally friendly, would you consider going back to eating meat if it were the lab-grown kind?

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago
[–] nbailey@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago

If it’s cheap, sure.

[–] Kacarott@feddit.de 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I've been vegetarian my whole life and vegan for ~4 years or so, and I would definitely eat lab grown meat (assuming the conditions you stated).

I almost certainly wouldn't eat it often but there is sooo many cultural dishes I haven't ever tried due to them containing meat, which I would love to try sometime.

Admittedly I expect that most things I would not end up liking, but the ability to try would be really nice.

[–] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

It would depend how this lab grown meat affects the environment or who produces it, how, what price it is.... I'm not opposed to it, just need to see the details.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

I don't have any ethical issues with it, I just don't find meat appetizing anymore. I'm all for having the option for people who want it though.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Zacryon@lemmy.wtf 1 points 4 weeks ago

If that's fine for them, why not? But I'd rather like to have a taste of myself. Always wondered what I would taste like.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Vegetarian not vegan, but I wouldn't really have an issue if ethical. Nutrition is another matter to consider.

[–] d416@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

10-year vegan here , 20-year veg. My answer is no no no.

Other than the taste and what it represents, there is far better food to eat which is grown outside than animal flesh.. grown inside a lab no less.

[–] schmurian@lsmu.schmurian.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'm vegetarian, my wife is vegan and I think this best reflects how I feel about it. Once you remove meat from your diet, you start to explore how flavourful everything else is.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Let's take this a step farther.

Would you eat human meat that was grown in a lab, if you could know for certain that the cells that were used to form the cultures were harvested from a consenting adult that was duly compensated? What if that person not only had consented, but wanted to be eaten, because they had a vore fetish, and enjoyed the thought of people eating pieces of them?

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

No, but the reason for it is one of safety, not morality:

Every bacteria, virus, fungus or other germ that can contaminate that lab and that meat is already adapted to hurt me, there is no species barrier. Nature generally abhors cannibalism because of this.

Now if you grow it in a lab, that might not be too much of a risk, but once you enter capitalist industrial production there are numerous incentives to cut corners and increase the risk of contamination.

Contamination also exists in factory farming, but at least there, there's a species barrier and the impact of that cannot be overstated.

Alternatively, you'll create a swamp of human meat factory farms that use huge amounts of antiviral, antifungal and antibiotic agents and just get soooooo much more effective in training multi-resistant germs, already adapted to human tissue.

[–] DeLacue@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Typically the major threats from canniblism are bacteria, viruses, fungus, parasites and prions. The bacteria, viruses, fungus and parasites shouldn't exist under properly maintained lab conditions. But prions are just misfolded proteins. They happen rarely and typically they are quarantined in the cell they were produced in. A number of things have to go very, very wrong for them to get out into your body from your own cells. However, eating and digesting cells can let out the prions they contain. Once they get out they'll start triggering other proteins to misfold but only if the right materials are present and if the prion came from human tissue you can be sure they are.

The human immune system is incredible, it has impressive countermeasures for almost anything you could think of. Heck it'll even attack solid objects that get stuck inside you. If you get shot by a bullet and don't get it removed (not recommended) your body will layer by layer eat that bullet. Slowly dissolving it and passing it into your blood so your kidneys can filter it and you can piss out that bullet over the course of decades. (Though having a bunch more metal in your blood causes its own problems). Your body has a response to just about everything including cancer which to get anywhere has to have some mutations to deceive your immune system.

Your body has no answer to prions whatsoever. Your body puts up no fight. If you are infected by a prion disease you are going to die. There is no vaccine, no cure, no treatment.

Once symptoms appear you'll have at most a few years if your very lucky but more likely a few months. Most prion diseases attack the brain. (side note; don't eat the brains of any animal regardless of circumstances)

Will perfectly sterile lab conditions eliminate prions as a concern? No If anything it might be possible that growing the meat artificially might result in more misfolded proteins. I'd still happily eat lab-grown animal meat. But lab-grown human meat? No thank you

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

there is no species barrier

There are a few things to unpack here.

First, most of the bacteria, et al. that we have to worry about right now from meat production and consumption are already well-adapted to human hosts. The solution, in most cases, is to adequately cook the meat, and to practice very basic food safety at home. Most food-borne illnesses are the result of inadequate cooking time and temperature. Other toxins--like botulism--are actually a biproduct of bacteria that colonize meat during putrefaction; you can kill the bacteria that produce the botulism toxin, but once it's present, there's not a lot you can do. (This is why you refrigerate meat. Clostridium botulinum reproduction is primarily room temperature, and anaerobic, so it's mostly a problem with canned goods that weren't sterilized properly during canning.)

The same solution to bacterial contamination in meat now would be the most effective solution for any lab-grown meat: cook your food correctly.

you’ll create a swamp of human meat factory farms that use huge amounts of antiviral, antifungal and antibiotic agents

I think that it's unlikely that, aside from cleaning agents, that you would need antibacterial/antifungal/virucidal agents in producing lab-grown meat of any kind. Many of the most effective cleaning agents work because there's no way to evolve protections against them. 70% isopropyl alcohol for instance; any resistance that bacteria evolved would also severely inhibit their ability to have any other functions. You can use radiation, or heat + steam (or even dry heat) to sterilize all of your equipment prior to introducing cells, and you have more control over the nutrient bath that it grows in. Depending on the nutrient bath, you can sterilize that by filtration; .22μm filtration is the standard for sterilizing IV and IM compounded medications. (.22μm is smaller than all bacteria, and many viruses. Molecules will still pass through that filter pore size though. You can also get filters down to .15μm if you need to remove more viruses.) Cows, chickens, etc. use so many antibacterials because they aren't able to put them in ideal conditions and maintain the desired production levels.

I think that the lack of a species barrier is a far, far smaller risk than you might believe it to be.

BUT.

I think that there is one enormous risk: prions. Misfolded proteins are exceptionally hard to detect, and anything that denatures them will denature other proteins as well. The risk is likely very, very low, given how uncommon prion diseases are, but it's definitely a risk when you can grow a culture indefinitely.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I would. Ever since I singed my arm with a small explosion in high school, I’ve been intrigued to try. It smelled delicious.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

I have a brand (yeah, the kind done with red-hot metal); my impression was that burning skin and subcutaneous fat smelled like a delicious pork roast.

[–] Befernafardofo@feddit.it 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If it's not wasteful/polluting to produce it, I don't see why not

[–] PetteriSkaffari@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Still need to investigate the sustainability of it before I would try, but presently there's no produce on sale here. But I'm pretty used to dishes without meat by now, so there's no direct need. I suppose it would be more targeted towards current meateaters, hopefully they stop destroying life on the planet at some point.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

I, a meat eater, and you, presumably not, will both continue to destroy life on this planet for as long as we exist.

Causing no damage isn’t really an option for one who exists.

[–] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

As a vegan, I would not eat lab grown meat.

It's mainly a texture/concept thing, my food needs to be safe from disembodied muscle, fat, skin, cartilage, bone, minced meat containing the combined flesh of thousands of raped and tortured carcasses, the faecal matter and bacterial colonies all meat is covered with, and the horrifying possibility of meat containing hidden cysts full of pus, bits of hair, teeth, genitals, eyeballs, parasites, tumours, zoonotic diseases, prions, etc.

Lab grown flesh would hopefully be exponentially cleaner, and far less problematic than the current rape torture factories and abattoir system, but I will never be able to thematically seperate labgrown meat from what meat currently is, not enough to be able to put it in my mouth and chew it anyway.

Also, all sentient life (as we know it) is made of flesh. Lab growing billions of disembodied chunks from a handful of sentient animals? There is still deep horror to this. Granted it's on a completely different scale to the current system of livestock atrocities, but it's still horrifying none the less.

[–] prosp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Oh, better to eat only broccoli. In the third world, with poop of human cow pig. With a lot of antibiotics, pesticides and other chemicals.

[–] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Did I really trigger you so badly that your feeble hormone addled carivore brain tried to get you to think about eating broccoli?

Wow. New vegan power unlocked.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just fyi, when I’m trying to stem the flow of vegan hate I see online, I find way, way, way more success in not being an obnoxious asshole. It’s a stupid trend, bashing and shitting all over vegans and vegetarians saying the habit is a good thing. Don’t make it harder for everyone else to get on board with this kind of shit.

[–] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Did you mean to reply to me?

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

…yes. Did you read what I said? Because it should be clear I mean you.

[–] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So you think vegans should passively put up with bullshit from trolls and never poke fun back? Why?

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Are you-

Um. I don’t know what’s even happening here. How do you not get what I’m saying.

Just fyi, when I’m trying to stem the flow of vegan hate I see online, I find way, way, way more success in not being an obnoxious asshole.

Or put another way: “it’s best when trying to make sure not everyone hates a good cause, to not be a total dick.” (Read: you’re being a total dick and not helping your cause.)

It’s a stupid trend, bashing and shitting all over vegans and vegetarians saying the habit is a good thing.

“I understand it’s a stupid trend that people on the internet hate vegans and anyone speaking positively about veganism/vegetarianism.”

Don’t make it harder for everyone else to get on board with this kind of shit.

“You’re making sticking up for veganism/vegans much harder by, as mentioned before, being a dick.”

Get it now?

[–] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you have less respect for vegans because you saw a vegan once took the piss out of a carnist troll on an internet forum... you do realise that's fucking pathetic of you right?

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That’s…not what I’m saying. At all. Are you…reading what I’m writing? I literally can’t make it any clearer.

You, (as in you, the person I’m talking to) are being a dick (a douchebag, a pissant, an annoying prick). And you being a dick (douchebag, pissant, et. al) makes trying to stop others (other people on the internet; people who are not you; meat eaters) from hating all vegans (other people; not yous who also happen to subscribe to and live the vegan lifestyle).

You being a dick makes vegans look like assholes. And looking like assholes makes people hate vegans even more. Stop it.

[–] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

So in order to placate the meat eating masses, vegans should never talk back to the meat headed trolls?

Bruh a vegan having good comebacks to trolling isn't going to tank the cause and my putting a troll in their place with a good quip isn't going to make the meat eating bigots hate vegans any more or less. They're going to hate us anyway, so why not let some vegans enjoy fucking with them back?

Or you know, just get the fuck over yourself and stop trying to control people.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No. In order to help…yknow…the earth? The animals? Why is this so much about other people for you?

Why are you vegan? For yourself? For clout? As I mentioned…like, three or four times…my whole idea is to help promote the good idea. Not you, not others. And you’re standing in the way of a good thing because you can’t get the fuck over yourself.

[–] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

So you promote this good thing by shitting on other vegans and acting as if you make the rules? Lmao, you're really making us look so great infront of the meatheads.

I'm not sure you've thought this through tbh.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

No.

No. Like, what is your damage?

For real. How are you not understanding what I’m saying?

I’m saying you’re not doing veganism any favors by being a dick. Holy shit, I literally have run out of ways to put what I’m saying. I’d like to see the idea stop getting shit on by people online. And people like you, being a dick, make that unlikely. Veganism is already facing an uphill battle in the likeability/image department, thanks to organizations like PETA and their annoying, obnoxious antics. You, being a dick about veganism makes that hill even steeper. Are you…grasping this yet?

[–] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Do you think the non-vegans in this thread respect you and like veganism more now after your behaviour here?

Or do you think that they also think you're a massive gaping asshole of a vegan?

Who would consider joining this movement after seeing you trying to be the vegan morality police over a joke you didn't like made by a fellow vegan?

The standard for veganism that you're trying to insist on setting here is socially controlling, demanding, manipulative and just plain unlikable.

You're really not helping the vegan cause with this behaviour.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ironic. “Don’t be a dick” is an unlikeable position.

That makes sense.

[–] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah fam, what's ironic is that you're the one being the dick here.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

lol. I ended up getting frustrated with you because it took me explaining a really simple thing like five different ways before you understood what I was saying. I feel like that wouldn’t hint at you being a really great judge of much, especially communicating about something you claim to care about with people on the internet. So…

[–] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Even an ounce of self reflection would go a long way my dude. Here's hoping one day you'll be able to get over that ego of yours and give it a go.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Oh my god the irony of this comment is almost too much.

I started out this entire goddamn odyssey of a conversation doing nothing more than suggesting you change your tact. Telling you i support what you’re doing but think you’re going about it all wrong.

You got snarky—even though you entirely misunderstood what I said. And continued misunderstanding what I was saying. Calling you out on doing your cause no favors and me getting annoyed that I couldn’t get my point across has nothing to do with….anything that you’re now trying to make me think this conversation has ever been about lol

[–] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm starting to feel ableist for laughing at you. This is no longer fun for me so I'm blocking you now.

Hopefully you can become a better person on your own. Good luck wanker.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

lol the “no u r” defense. A+