this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
227 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4563 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago

He's a flip flopper - nothing out of his mouth is real... that's probably why Trump is so enamored with him.

[–] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 20 points 1 month ago

Nobody hates the poor like the newly wealthy.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

JD Vance can promise blood in the streets, and I'm confident he can fulfil his promises. If you're invested in the immiseration of your neighbors at the enrichment of your bosses, this guy is going to deliver for you in spades.

Guys like Greg Abbott and Ron DeSantis have already demonstrated their ability to churn out the vile and destructive policies, aimed directly at their state's most vulnerable populations. They only seem to get more entrenched within their base after each newly constructed migrant torture center or book burning ceremony or anti-abortion inquisition.

Vance wants to take this to a national scale.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 15 points 1 month ago

Aristopopulist is a term I've never heard before and it really englobes that phenomenon of far right bourgeois and aristocrats trying to fish working class votes. That's nice to know.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I don't think he even knows what that means

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That word... It's so contradictory.

[–] juergen@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 month ago

...and yet so apt - though it probably applies to Trump even more than to Vance: Born with a silver spoon in his mouth, and yet able to tell (sort of) regular people what they want to hear. They could probably have used this skill for Good, but that's not where they went. Sometimes I wonder whether they think they did.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

The Republican party hasn't had a real plan in a decade.

2016's only platform was to Lock Up Hilary (?) and Build That Wall.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


‘The tragedy of Trump’s candidacy is that, embedded in his furious exhortations against Muslims and Mexicans and trade deals gone awry is a message that America’s white poor don’t need: that everything wrong in your life is someone else’s fault.”

Vance may be an Ivy League-educated lawyer and venture capitalist, and a politician heavily backed by Silicon Valley billionaires, but he grew up in the decaying steel town of Middletown, Ohio, the descendant of hillbillies who had migrated in search of jobs.

Raised in poverty and within a dysfunctional family, Vance escaped by joining the marines, before studying law at Yale University, giving him entry into the highest echelons of American society.

The troubles tormenting working-class communities may partly be the product of globalisation and industrial decline but, Vance insists, speak much more to cultural and moral failings; workers given to indolence (“we choose not to work when we could be looking for jobs”) and a desire to play the victim.

That shift was emphasised by perhaps the most significant moment of the convention – not Trump’s coronation or Vance’s elevation but the speech by Sean O’Brien, president of the Teamsters, the first address by a union leader to the RNC.

What is needed, rather, is an elite capable, unlike now, of inculcating the lower orders with an “understanding of what constitutes their own good” and ensuring, through cultural and religious constraints, that they don’t tumble into degeneracy.


The original article contains 1,068 words, the summary contains 234 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!