this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
335 points (90.4% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2203 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] takeda@lemmy.world 55 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

I love Buttigieg, would definitely vote for him, but this would make me anxious. We already have black woman running and there are a lot of people in swing states that have a problem with just that.

I just want to be sure that the fascist criminal will lose.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 18 points 5 months ago (5 children)

But he's a veteran. Would they vote for the cop + veteran ticket or the felon + coach fucker one?

Time to show their true colors.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It didn't work for John Kerry when he ran against a draft dodger. I guess being a combat vet wasn't enough? Having been a cop would tip the balance?

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 8 points 5 months ago

Well, we all know that the salute-the-troops, thank-you-for-your-service crowd are just playing pretend.

We all saw what happened when their nominee insulted a purple heart recipient and past POW, and everyone just cheered.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Well they elected a football coach over a former DA. You know, a literal "law and order" type.

Never underestimate conservatives' ability to put their biases over their alleged morals.

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

GOP/Conservatives hate veterans. All of them do. They like to wave the flag and pretend, but they elected a literal draft dodging bitch who openly mocked Gold Star families. A big part of P2025 is the destruction of the VA and VA Compensation.

Don’t let any Republican voter act like they are pro-veteran or military.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Conservatives hate veterans.

Trump even called them "losers" and "suckers" IIRC.

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

And then votes for him. If someone votes for Trump, you get to throw it in their how they voted for someone that called veterans “losers”.

I just got to do this to the out laws talking shit on Harris. “So you voted for the draft dodging bitch that called veterans losers? Must suck to suck.”

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

My take as well. We need to win this one. I love Pete, and would happily vote for him for president of he were the nominee, but a black woman and a gay man on the same ticket is just going to be too much for a lot of voters. Plus, I think they need to select someone from a purple state who can help bring in important votes.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago
[–] shades@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 4 months ago

Making America pick between fascism or whether or not they would rather a futt bucker, is a risky spicy gamble