this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
434 points (97.8% liked)

World News

38977 readers
2153 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I dont think it's quite the same thing though. US contractors won't be fighting, I think they'll just be maintaining and repairing equipment.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Arguably, a much more critical job for a capital-intensive army.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it’s actually huge. Especially for maintaining a weapon as complicated as an Abrams tank. If it can be repaired close to the front lines then that has the potential to cut days off the turnaround time compared to towing it over to Poland.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

I will never understand why the American military think it's a good idea to send them tanks that are so complicated. Especially when they're going up against cold war era relics.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago

Because it's what we have to send. It's not like we have a lot of extra Sherman tanks we can send anymore.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Do we have non-complicated tanks?

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago

Long term investment. Same as in Israel. Trying to save democracies from annihilation.