this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

38977 readers
2192 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Health experts say axing plan to block sales of tobacco products to next generation will cost thousands of lives

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vrek@programming.dev 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I hate when articles say "will cost X number of lives". No it won't. It will cut them short, it will costs years off people's lives. Unless it's sterilized people it won't cost lives.

A person may die at 40 instead of 80 but that is still a life.

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You bring up a good point, what does it actually mean? If eight people have their lives shortened by a decade, is that one life lost or eight?

[–] XbSuper@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

And then they lost them

[–] Kacarott@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You could say this about anything though. A serial killer isn't taking lives, merely shortening them. Suicide isn't ending a life it's just shortening one. Literally all death can be seen as merely the shortening of an otherwise longer life, which makes your distinction pointless.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes it's less extreme language. It's doesn't manipulate emotions as much, that's the point.

[–] Kacarott@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

How is the language extreme? For something to "cost lives" means exactly for those lives to be cut short, there is no other meaningful definition. The language used is exactly as extreme as the scenario it describes, by definition.

Do you apply your same logic to other scenarios too? Like would rather that "the tsunami cost the lives of 55 people" be reworded as "the tsunami shortened the lives of 55 people"?

[–] vrek@programming.dev 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If something is $20 and I buy it with $100 bill, doesn't mean it cost me $100.

Now something like the zika virus which sterilized men several years ago dud cost lives. Lives that may of been made but can no longer.

That is the difference. Each death from smoking or a tsunami or a mass murderer costed years of potential life but didnt cost the whole life.

[–] Kacarott@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

I think where the difference lies is that you are interpreting "cost X lives" to mean "cost X lifetimes of Human experience" while the interpretation I, and articles use is more like "cost X people their status of being alive"

[–] Kacarott@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

That is not what costing something means. Cost is to lose something which you have, it does not mean to lose the potential to something you don't have. If an apple costs a dollar, it means you had that dollar, and now you don't. The impact of the apple was for the number of dollars you have to decrease by one. If you buy it with 100 dollars it obviously doesn't cost 100 dollars because you get 99 dollars back.

When talking about lives, we don't get them back. People have lives, and if something causes them to lose them, it means costs them a life.

If I own a car, then after ten years of owning and driving it, I trade it to buy something else, that thing still cost me a car. The amount of car I have does not decrease over time but through use. It's quality might, but the count does not care about quality. Same with life. People who are middle-aged do not only have half a life, they are still fully alive.