this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
867 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2169 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A while back, HR 1 For the People Act promised to remedy much of the issue but it never got a vote in the senate because Republicans held the Senate Speaker until the next congress was formed.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

And because, having gotten back in power, Dem leadership didn't take it up again as they too are getting rich from the current system.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

TBF, after the 2020 election they were faced with issues like budget reconciliation and debt limit (without which nothing would be voted on at all during a government shutdown) as well as reimplementing some of the many regulations taken down by the Trump admin and finally passing a 1.9 Trillion Dollar infrastructure deal alongside a new round of stimulus checks (which the receiving states decided how to use, sadly), and many congressional hearings about corruption of the former administration and federal judges (which ultimately hasn't lead anywhere other than referrals to the DOJ).

So in the 2 year span that they held 48 + 2 senate seats and house majority, they were pretty tied up I would say.

EDIT: Plus, it would've been filibustered anyways.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Same reason Biden is talking about a potential tax on the rich but won't ever be caught talking about repealing the Trump tax raise on the working class that actually happened.

[–] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The Trump tax cut expires next year. Biden has promised not to renew it if he's reelected.

Get informed.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Uh huh.

And he didn't repeal it why?

[–] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

You should probably not be asking smug rhetorical questions when you don't actually understand how the federal government works.

Use a search engine, educate yourself.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It was an act passed by congress and signed by a sitting president. Biden alone doesn't have the authority to change it, and if he did try that then it would be caught up in courts for years.