this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Open Source

31118 readers
310 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teri@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately it's still possible to rewrite a VC-backed clone and start making incompatible changes. Think about Facebook's "threads.net". They sure did not take Lemmy source code.

[–] pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You just have to be very careful to not have your developers to get even close to the AGPL source code, because if it's similar, there's a possibility the judge says you copied the AGPL code and now your license is AGPL too. There's a reason companies are really scared about everything related to the license...

But yes, this happens and you have to have resources to fight it. Which is not easy.

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Sadly, the more realistic option is that the judge dismisses the complaint because they don't understand open source.

Happens sadly quite often.

Or it never encounters a judge because the author of the open source project doesn't have the money to fight a megacorp in a court.