this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

23274 readers
2811 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Fenton, population 226, brings in over $1 million per year through its mayor’s court, an unusual justice system in which the mayor can serve as judge even though he’s responsible for town finances.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pan_troglodytes@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the most expedient solution would be to drive nowhere near Fenton, LA

[–] Hnazant@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've seen this movie. Stars dan Aykroyd and John candy.

[–] eierkuchen@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Great movie, great actors.

[–] Turun@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Or just not break the speed limit?

I get the concerns about possible corruption (though the article didn't show us anything in this regard), but I'm like what's the problem? If you break the law you get a fine. I'd be more concerned about the paces where you don't!

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure the only people getting ticketed are ones who have genuinely broken the law. There is no conflict of interest here at all.

[–] Turun@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

If you have any proof on the contrary I'd like to hear it. Because the article didn't provide any.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Yeah, I clocked you going 20 over"

"But I was driving the speed limit"

"Take it up with the judge"

---Later---

"You were going 20 over, pay at the desk"

"But I was going the speed limit!"

"Got any proof?"

"No?"

"Then go pay at the desk"

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More like "you were going 1 mph over, the law's the law"

Speed trap towns aren't reasonable. That's the point.

[–] Turun@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

The article said they only write tickets for going more than 61mph in a 50mph zone. That's 20% over, 44% longer brake distance if there is an accident and more noise for the people living nearby.

[–] Turun@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

If this happens it will be a scandal. The article only showed cases of:

“Yeah, I clocked you going 20 over”
“I' did, but will still fight the ticket in court”
“Take it up with the judge”

“You were going 20 over, pay at the desk”
“All right, I actually did driver too fast. But it's not fair!!!”
“Alright, go pay at the desk”

So I'll wait until someone can actually show that evidence is faked and people are sentenced without due process, violating the principle of "innocent until proven guilty". Because what the article showed were a lot of people who broke traffic laws, but none who were bribed or who sentenced people to fines without evidence.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The speed limit is often artificially low to entice people to speed though. Especially in towns like this that subsist off speeding fines.

Back in 2007 a group of UGA students drove the 285 loop around Atlanta at exactly over the posted speed limit (at the time 55mph). This caused traffic to back up for hours and the teens were arrested for blocking the flow of traffic.

And, from personal experience, driving on 285 at less than 70mph is absolutely terrifying. You're liable to get hit by someone who is just moving with the flow of traffic. It's substantially less safe to adhere to the posted speed limits.

So what is the expectation then, if not to speed?

[–] Turun@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

The street design may be a massive problem, indeed. And I welcome any change towards more reasonable street design and more public transport. This part of the high way system seems to be rather busy - perfect for a high speed train connection.

But that's not what the article criticizes and this misdirection is exactly what I find problematic about the article. Until better roads are designed "just break the law" doesn't sound like a good idea to me.