Open Source

36598 readers

432 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Cloak@lemmy.ml

kevincox@lemmy.ml

CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml

Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml

is there something about rust which precludes copyleft licensing? (programming.dev)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by some@programming.dev to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I often see Rust mentioned at the same time as MIT-type licenses.

Is it just a cultural thing that people who write Rust dislike ~~Libre~~ copyleft licenses? Or is it baked in to the language somehow?

Edit: It has been pointed out that I meant to say "copyleft", not "libre", so edited the title and body likewise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheChickenOfDoom@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Love how *BSD-obsessed people bend over backwards and find all sorts of loopholes to justify their garbage license that lets Microsoft abuse their entire goddamn OS for their own horrible purposes.

Shame on you.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Lmao that my pedanticism could be perceived as BSD advocacy - fwiw, I primarily use GNU/Linux, I develop GPL-licensed software, and I think GPLv3 or AGPLv3 are good choices for many new projects starting today.

My opinions about the history and future of copyleft are somewhat complicated but I didn't mention any opinions in the comment you're replying to - I was just correcting your factual misunderstandings about the accepted definitions of these terms.