this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
321 points (98.2% liked)

politics

23339 readers
2643 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Worth watching the video

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 13 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I’m genuinely still not convinced the whole fucking thing wasn’t essentially a hoax

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm 100% convinced it definitely was a hoax. I was sure of it the moment it happened. I wasn't even surprised - "Oh, here we go! An 'assassination attempt?' Of course!"

Then his ear, which should have been nearly torn off, heals entirely in about 2 weeks?

AND they barely mention it, because they don't want anybody looking too closely at it, and realizing that they blew an innocent (okay, MAGA, so not that innocent) man's head off in front of his family. Someone, probably more than one, on their side is responsible for murder.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I’m fairly certain he simply got some color. Remember that he spent several years getting pretty involved with pro wrestling. And the wound was frankly far too clean, and healed far too quickly. Cartilaginous damage tends to leave some kinda messy scars, and are often noticeable with even the best healthcare, but he’s got nary a scratch.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

He was hit by shrapnel, not a bullet. Which is why it took them an extra week to get their favorite sketchy doctor to give a false medical report after the first doc refused to say it was a bullet wound

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Shrapnel from what…? Iirc there was a wood podium.

[–] HewlandRower@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I believe it was from one of those clear glass teleprompters.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

There were reports of Trump being in a haze afterwards, like he had PTSD.

Also, there's specific accounts of that guy being so bad at guns that his school gun team kicked him out.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

school gun team

This fucking country, man.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

They're generally well organized for competitions. Lots of countries have them for airguns when they can't get full firearms. They emphasize safety and shooting skills.

He was specifically kicked out because he shot across lanes. That's a huge safety risk and will get you kicked out of most ranges. The club acted correctly.