this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
883 points (94.1% liked)

196

5128 readers
1701 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
883
Boeing rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) by SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.world
 

And their planes made with scrap parts are still flying around.

Edit: A lot of new .world users showing up with ChatGPT responses about how this was a conspiracy, reminds me of an article i read this week.

https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/657978/reddit-ai-experiment-banned

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 85 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You've misread the passive language here. 'no prints were recovered' can mean that they tried to find prints and couldn't, or that they never even bothered to try getting prints off the gun.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

I'll admit, this irks me in mystery shows. Those don't seem like something you'd reliably get.

"Sir, just as you predicted, we found the kitchen knife in the third drainage grate of the northern side of the city sewage system, wrapped loosely in five layers of cheesecloth, wadded with human waste. And, we've performed a DNA and fingerprint analysis on the handle. The prints perfectly match your suspect, sir!"

[–] Supervivens@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It could also mean no print were recovered other than his obviously which they may have just not bothered to mention

[–] TheYojimbo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Yeah that's the obvious answer here, his finger was on the gun so his prints were there too...

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 27 points 1 day ago

Also, people need to understand that not everything you touch will 100% have your fingerprints.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago

i didn’t, i noted that the presence of prints on the notebook implies an effort to obtain fingerprints on things. the gun description is particularly good for collecting prints, and i know all sorts of random things could explain that otherwise… i do find it curious, however