this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
1008 points (98.2% liked)

Greentext

6184 readers
921 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 50 points 6 days ago (26 children)

People acting like the armed left isn’t preparing.

Citation needed.

But, more important, why does every motherfucker shooting their mouth off about this think that you win a fucking civil war by just going out and shooting things? Like, does nobody get that attacks need useful intelligence, planning, logistics, transportation, and it can’t be out in the open, you gotta either fight it guerilla, or you’re just dead.

Exactly the point of everyone who ever pointed out that your guns are completely useless if your government ever goes off the rails.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 days ago (11 children)

Well, the other side of it is that it doesn't matter how good your planning and logistics are if you only have rocks to throw when you get there

Nobody with a lick of sense ever said that a civil war against an established and well equipped government was going to be fought on battlefields, lined up and infantry vs civilian infantry.

And it takes more than guns, as the Iraqis and Afghanis showed. But calling guns useless in a revolution or civil war, much less as a resistance or insurgency is just stupid.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works -3 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Guns are pretty much giving the government the excuse to just shoot you as a crazy gun nut (or extremist group,...) and shoot you without any morale repercussions in the people they use to do so and without any PR nightmare in the greater population for them.

[–] theblips@lemm.ee 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works -4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Non-violent protests in large numbers would be one option. It is much harder to get the military or police to shoot a crowd of a few tens of thousands of unarmed civilians, especially when it is people from their own communities. And when you do it anyway you have a very hard time suppressing it in your and the international media.

[–] theblips@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What do non-violent "protests" do? Why would police ever really try to supress them if they don't serve any purpose other than virtue signalling? Do you protesters expect Trump to stop ICE raids because "wow, I guess these signs with me drawn as a pig are really making me think", or MAGA supporters to stop voting for him because you wasted your sunday out in the sun walking around?

[–] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 days ago

You will still be shot and abducted. It will not be any harder for the cops.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)