Technically wrong. Any rational number though.
If by "gives them" you mean in their completely bogus calculation then yes.
I am inclined to agree. People with dementia like Trump might just repeat stuff they heard recently without a deeper understanding.
Maybe keep maintaining the HashMap you have now and use one of these less portable mechanisms in a test to alert you when you forgot to register one?
They seem to have an easier time not making generalized jokes on how having a partner is toxic, painful, a loss of freedom,...
At some point, the older kids are providing child care for the younger ones.
Which is called parentification and usually seen as a form of child abuse.
I mean to be fair 99% of those rings look ugly.
Or problems only exist for people who spend dozens of hours each week on a game and make it their entire identity, something a working dev just can't do.
In the context of a conversation about people who come in just before closing it could also just be taken as a hint that he is one of those people.
The problem with optional typing is that it has all the downsides of both but gives you very little of the advantages of a strong static type system, e.g. being able to rely on types catching certain kinds of errors when refactoring because you don't know for sure that all APIs have types. It is really nothing more than an admission by dynamically typed languages that static types are so useful you can't really do without them while at the same time not admitting that it might be best to move to a language and library ecosystem that was designed with static types from the start.
Wearing insanely heavy armor only to leave the helmet off seems like the kind of thing so obviously stupid it should be kept out of propaganda material at all costs.
No no, libraries paper, not rock. Paper beats rock.