this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
68 points (95.9% liked)

Feminism

495 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the feminism community on Lemmy.World!

Rules:

  1. This is a feminist community, meant for discussing issues around equality and gender. Disagreement is acceptable but anti-feminist statements are not. Similarly, TERF-aligned comments, including anti-trans or other anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments are not allowed. This does not preclude debunking anti-feminist talking points.
  2. Posts must be related to feminism, gender issues, or related content. Topics can include current issues/news, historical topics, personal questions/thoughts, or discussion threads. If you are unsure if your post is on-topic, feel free to message the mods before posting.
  3. Memes and humor are allowed but should not be excessively posted.
  4. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Utilizing such language in your username will also result in a ban.
  5. Follow site-wide rules.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
jeffw@lemmy.world
68
The UK’s Anti-Trans Ruling Is a Defeat for All Women (www.thenation.com)
submitted 1 week ago by squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/feminism@lemmy.world
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Even the self-described feminists celebrating the Supreme Court’s attempt to banish trans people from womanhood will pay a heavy price.

Archived version without paywall: https://archive.is/vOqSz

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I honestly think she considers herself an "honorary man" at this point, no joke. That picture on the yacht with the cocktail & cigar were... well, she has written villains herself, I can't understand she doesn't see the parallels. The only explanation is that she does and that she embraces it 100%

Also, as a man; we really don't want her.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

She's a terf. I really doubt she's suddenly a transman.

[–] zeezee@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

really wild take here but I've had this pet theory of mine that Rowling actually would like to identify as a man (technically already did as Robert Galbraith) but because she is AFAB and has experienced a lot of misogynistic antagonation throughout the years - she can't in good conscious do so as she feels she would be betraying women the world over.

I feel this would explain why she experiences intense transphobia and why she sees transfemmes as "men in disguise" (trauma response from cis men) as well as dismissal of transmascs (if I had to suffer in a patriarchal world, so do you and you're not allowed to opt out by "pretending" to be a man)

could be totally off the mark but I feel it wouod explain a lot 🤷

[–] unbuckled_easily933@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

I’ve seen this take a number of times and I think it is the most likely explanation.