this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
296 points (86.6% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4563 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A group of undecided Latino voters said they would vote for President Joe Biden after watching his Thursday night debate with former President Donald Trump.

...

A clip posted on X shows the group being interviewed by a journalist. One man said he would vote for Biden because "Trump sounded like a crazy liar," according to Matt A. Barreto, professor of Political Science and Chicana/o & Central American Studies at UCLA.

The man being interviewed said Trump "said the same thing time after time" and was not answering questions or "saying how he would fix things," according to a Newsweek translation.

He went on to admit that "Biden was indeed a bit slow in talking," saying the president "has a stutter" but believes Biden explained "what he has done and what he is still doing while president.

"After being undecided for a little while, I think today, I switched to Biden," he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That I was right, democrats all got taken in by conservative bullying and threw away their best chance at winning the presidency with the incumbent president who already beat trrmp and gained allies and voters through progressive legislation.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

...which conservatives? They were political commentators, Democrats and their funders. Biden is/was not going to win.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I asked which conservatives (had a meaningful impact on Biden stepping down).

Your statement was not sensible in the first place, and is evermore silly now.

The Democratic Party put pressure on him to stand down because he was not going to win; only his pollster said he had a chance, no others did.

He certainly won’t now.

He was never going to.

Calls for biden to step down are not significant in the real world

They were.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're having trouble understanding simple statements.

Don't put that on me.

You can be confused about what you're saying, but it doesn't mean that you're incorrect assumptions are correct.

Biden easily could have won.

His supporters were afraid he wouldn't, listened to tired conservative propaganda from four years ago, and circled around the baseless, cynical take that a candidate who already beat Trump and has gained lots of allies during his first term because of his progressive legislation couldn't win twice.

It's a foolish sentiment, but it's much easier to tear someone down than stand by your convictions.

That's what you're doing here.

I'll find someone to slow clap for you.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Feel free to point out which statements.

Again, which conservatives, and why did they have an influence?

The Democrats are applauding him for stepping down.

It’s a foolish sentiment, but it’s much easier to tear someone down than stand by your convictions.

Sticking by what you're saying when it's clearly wrong is not standing by your convictions, is folly. It's digging a hole and putting your head it in so far that you ignore reality.

Your attempt at performative comments (to... no one but me) don't look smart.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And sticking by my correct statements, despite the bandwagon patting themselves on the back for being duped is not folly.

You're close but woooosh

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're right, everyone else is wrong, including Biden who said it was the right decision.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not everyone, and not what you're taking about, and not in that context, but I appreciate your enthusiasm.