this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
1268 points (95.7% liked)

Science Memes

10885 readers
3964 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

While that's correct and all, it still irks me when somebody uses a word that has a shorter, older variant. (Gives side-eye to orientated)

[–] DillyDaily@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

orientated

Is this common in American English? I don't think I've ever seen the word oriented double handled like that. Irregardless, it slew me

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

At least with orientated it kind makes sense because orientation is the process of orienting, so to have done the process would be to be orientated in a weird way but irregardless will always irk me because the ir and the less make a double negative, making the meaning as written 'with regard' which just doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Like if somebody misunderstood a sentence with a double negative we would call them wrong but because it's a single word they get to change the entire language, regardless of its structure and rules? Seems kinda bogus to me.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago

You can double for intensification. Language isn't maths, you cannot count negations to reach meaning.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Never seen it here.

[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 2 points 3 months ago

I'm a native US English speaker. I would only ever say oriented. As a kid, not knowing the "correct" form, I got corrected for saying orientated. I watch content from a lot of countries and do hear at least some British English speakers using orientated.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

"Orientated" is reasonably common in British English, I think. I remember thinking someone had misspelt it the first time I saw "oriented" written down.