this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)

Metabolic Health

104 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss metabolic health research, papers, talks, etc.

This topic can touch upon many people's personal triggers, so please be civil.

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Stay on topic
  3. Don't farm rage
  4. Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!!
  5. No Blanket down voting - If you only come to this community to downvote its the wrong community for you

The banner poster in high resolution can be found here

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Despite intensive research, the causes of the obesity epidemic remain incompletely understood and conventional calorie-restricted diets continue to lack long-term efficacy. According to the carbohydrate-insulin model (CIM) of obesity, recent increases in the consumption of processed, high–glycemic-load carbohydrates produce hormonal changes that promote calorie deposition in adipose tissue, exacerbate hunger, and lower energy expenditure. Basic and genetic research provides mechanistic evidence in support of the CIM. In animals, dietary composition has been clearly demonstrated to affect metabolism and body composition, independently of calorie intake, consistent with CIM predictions. Meta-analyses of behavioral trials report greater weight loss with reduced-glycemic load vs low-fat diets, though these studies characteristically suffer from poor long-term compliance. Feeding studies have lacked the rigor and duration to test the CIM, but the longest such studies tend to show metabolic advantages for low-glycemic load vs low-fat diets. Beyond the type and amount of carbohydrate consumed, the CIM provides a conceptual framework for understanding how many dietary and nondietary exposures might alter hormones, metabolism, and adipocyte biology in ways that could predispose to obesity. Pending definitive studies, the principles of a low-glycemic load diet offer a practical alternative to the conventional focus on dietary fat and calorie restriction.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2933

Full Paper here

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think this leads people to draw the wrong conclusions about activity and weight. They are correlated, but most people think active people have less weight.

But really it’s much more likely that certain people’s hormones only tell their body to store a little fat. If they eat more than is needed for that, the body must burn those calories, so they are then more active.

But people so often think that they need to exercise if they need to lose weight. (Additionally, this may be counterproductive because if your hormones needed to store fat, and you’ve burned the calories already, you’re going to be more hungry, and trying to resist that is just torture.)

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Some populations are very sensitive to carbohydrates, native americans for example. So there is a spectrum of carbohydrate tolerance out there.

But people so often think that they need to exercise if they need to lose weight. (Additionally, this may be counterproductive because if your hormones needed to store fat, and you’ve burned the calories already, you’re going to be more hungry, and trying to resist that is just torture.)

Exercise is healthy, but not a great way to lose weight by itself. But exercise is a good adjunct to a weight loss program. The hormone insulin is driven by diet, if the diet is clean and insulin is low, exercise wont change that. In fact when people are doing a ketogenic diet, when they exercise, they burn fat not sugar, so they don't need to eat more food (if they are overweight) and they don't feel tortured.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, those are great clarifications