this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
199 points (84.4% liked)

News

23266 readers
3586 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

I really hope Harris can beat Trump.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago (4 children)

As much as I hate it, I think there too much subconscious misogyny to try it. It's a recipe for failure.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago (3 children)

And racism. Can't forget the racism!

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Well as a European, I’m going to give the US some credit: voters did elect a black, ‘possibly-Muslim’ guy with a name that sounds vaguely like a well-known terrorist. And they elected him twice.

Besides, the democrats really appear to be in a situation where they’ll vote for a proverbial ham sandwich if it stops Trump from getting the presidency.

Are there racist voters who hate women? Obviously. But it’s not like it’s an immediate disqualification.

[–] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

Make it a real ham sandwich instead of a proverbial one, and you've got a deal.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 1 points 3 months ago

The ham sandwich has my vote since its not Trump.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I think that would work for her. There's way more minorities and centrists that would come out to vote for her because of Obama's legacy than racists that would stay home out of spite IMO. I certainly don't think she'll be anything like Obama, but one could hope.

[–] torsday@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Though racism is a factor, that doesn't mean she isn't also a bad candidate.

[–] TreeGhost@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Aren't all of the misogynists already voting for Trump? I think just being a younger woman candidate could energize the younger voting base.

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Especially with bodily autonomy being a live issue

[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah it will energize, and they’ll be really confused on voting day when they find out they needed to register to vote.

I think voting should be mandatory, easier, and have an abstain option for those people who don’t want to choose.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm afraid a lot of older Dems just wouldn't vote, it's a low turnout that could be killer.

I don't know if she really resonated with the younger voters that much, not like AOC for instance.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

All the right wingers who wanted Trump are going to vote for him and all the Republicans that wanted someone else rallied behind a woman during their primaries. I think people are blowing up an issue thats less impactful than they make it out to be.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago

I'm sure there's plenty of misogyny and racism to put people off, but don't underestimate "being another bland candidate who won't get people excited enough to vote".

It wasn't just women haters that made Trump beat Clinton.

People's lives are shit, and while Trump will for sure make them even shittier, "things will be mostly the same as they are now, with some baby steps towards things you've wanted for decades" isn't exactly a rallying cry for the ages.

The Democrats were never going to let Sanders have anything, but AOC? Maybe? She at least makes the news when she says things. And unlike Republicans, they're not horrible things.

[–] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Probably not, she's got the charisma of Hillary, and two strikes (race and gender) against her. But Biden is dragging the rest of the party down with him. With Harris we probably get a Trump presidency (we have at least a fighting chance to avoid it). But with Biden we get a Trump presidency, a landslide election giving him a "mandate" and assuredly a Republican House and Senate to go along with it. Sooo worth a shot with the old switcharoo I guess.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

She can’t.

Whitmer maybe could. If she has a strong running mate.

Harris just isnt a good candidate.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

Oh no you don’t. We’ve got Whitmer until the end of 2026. You can have her then and not a second sooner.

If SCOTUS keeps on this retro “states rights” bender, we’re just gonna make our own country. With blackjack. And great lakes.

[–] halferect@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think she can if she chooses a progressive vp

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] halferect@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah...I feel no matter what we are not in a good place to defeat Trump. I'm just trying to think of best ways given what we are given. My choice would be biden and replace Harris with a progressive woman

I feel no matter what we are not in a good place to defeat Trump.

I don't think that's actually true. I think the polling data we have is skewed against Biden, and models like The Keys to the White House (which don't reference polling data) point towards a Trump defeat. 538 has Biden beating Trump more than half of the time, and it's even using the polls. Things aren't nearly as bad as people are making them out to be, and I don't know why.