this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
-33 points (11.6% liked)

Videos

14264 readers
295 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's still an assumption, the shooter could have just been trying to blend in with the trump crowd rather then being a subscriber

[–] Hawanja@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If he were trying to blend in, it'd be more logical to just wear a Trump shirt rather than a somewhat obscure youtube channel. It's been a few days, and the shooter's conservative political leanings have been well established. Safe to say this was an accurate assumption.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Are you assuming he hadn't watched demolition ranch before? Why?

(Better be as good as the inverse logic of 'he's a viewer because he wears their merch')

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The entire point of this discussion is about MISINFORMATION

Making assumptions directly leads to misinformation.

So the person trying to be clear about what is known and unknown shouldn't conflate a shirt with a subscriber.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If we're gonna use Occam's razor we must make all things equal. That means thinking of all the possibilities before applying the logic sieve.

Hence my counterclaim.

Stop policing thought please.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 3 months ago

I'm not policing thought, think what you like, please

I just want to be clear about what we have observed (know) vs what we deduce (speculate) our confidence may be high but it isn't directly observed.