this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
876 points (97.2% liked)

People Twitter

4850 readers
1563 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is very true. Men's pants are tagged with their waist size and will also normally have their leg length on the tag. I've got a fairly big belly so I have a large waist size compared to my height so this is useful.

Having to do the mental mathematics to consider which size I am or having to try on the clothes to get an understanding would be a major pain.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 78 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 1 month ago

I struggled to fit in a size 34 a while ago.

Slightly more expensive brand, I fit in 34 just fine. So in my mind I still have a 34" waist.

I do not.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I went to get a couple of pairs of jeans from a Plato's closet recently. I tried 6 pairs of different brand jeans, all 34/32. 4 pairs didn't clear my thighs, 1 couldn't button, the last fit. The cut of the jeans makes those numbers mean very different things..

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cut is part of it, but they literally aren't consistent about the length of the cloth, even with the same number shown.

"Boot cut" or "skinny" 34 waist from every single brand will differ, even if the cut was exactly the same.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I once bought 2 of exactly the same pants at the same time, after having the same one from a year earlier and liking it that much. They were both different to my original one and different to each other. I had to send the too tight one back and the replacement was different yet again. Seems like people just do not care enough that there is next to no standard.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

no standard.

My only charitable theory is that vendors order clothing in batches with only a general description being passed between batch runs. No CAD drawlings in the whole industry.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But all of my 3 pants must have been from the same batch but still deviated more than 1 inch in waist size to the previous specimen. So one was too small to wear, the other needing a belt.

[–] KeenSnappersDontCome@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

They also cut the fabric multiple layers high with a giant stamping tool. The more layers of fabric they cut at once the more variance there is between top layer and bottom layer but the cheaper the process is. Higher quality cheap brands will advertise that they only cut x amount vs what the competitors cut so they have less variation.