this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
714 points (97.7% liked)

News

23406 readers
3151 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Black man has filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against a hotel in Detroit, Michigan, alleging the hotel only offered him a job interview after he changed the name on his resume, according to a copy of the lawsuit obtained by CNN.

Dwight Jackson filed the lawsuit against the Shinola Hotel on July 3, alleging he was denied a job when he applied as “Dwight Jackson,” but later offered an interview when he changed his name to “John Jebrowski.”

The lawsuit alleges Jackson was denied a job in “violation of Michigan Elliott Larsen Civil Rights Act.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 94 points 4 months ago (8 children)

I've witnessed this first hand from the hiring side for an IT position. I was going through resumes with my boss and he straight up said, "I don't want any hispanics, I want a white guy." while tossing anything with a hispanic name to the side without even looking beyond that. This was in Orlando in an area with a large hispanic population. The kicker is that my boss was actually hispanic himself!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 66 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The kicker is that my boss was actually hispanic himself!

In the UK we call that racist taxi driver syndrome. A lot of immigrants come to the UK and because it's a good money earner, or at least because they think it's a good money earner, they tend to buy a taxi.

Anyway you get in and suddenly they start telling you about all their world views, usually it's along the lines have there been too many immigrants. Even though they are an immigrant themselves.

Very much a case of shutting the door behind themselves.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Haha so true. I remember some my friend's family going on about how we should all vote leave because of all the immigrants.

Mate, you were born in Napoli. You're as Italian as spaghetti. I'm not that kind of British person and, as far as I'm concerned, you're more than welcome here but you're the "immigrant" you hate so much. Not only that, your that being that person while banging on about how bad immigration is to a group of very obviously white native British people. It was just the most bizarre thing ever.

He still has an accent.

I genuinely wanted to be like "but we like you." I don't think that would have gone down very well though.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

I’ve spent too much of my life not speaking up at all. Then, I finally achieved speaking up by summoning anger and fear to motivate me. But my presentation is harsh and unfriendly.

My challenge now is to learn to disagree, when it needs to be done, but in a friendly and respectful way.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago

I genuinely wanted to be like “but we like you.” I don’t think that would have gone down very well though.

Maybe you should have, I'm almost certain somebody did it later in another conversation. Better from a friend and so on.

[–] mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I'm Chinese and I am also extremely weary of hiring someone from China. Pretty scared of CCP spies TBH.

[–] catbum@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

This is actually really fascinating to me, the idea that citizenship/nationality is a bigger factor in how you feel and that race isn't a key factor. It tells me maybe society (globally, generally) is getting less plainly racist, but anxieties around nationality (and what that could indicate about individual attitudes and intentions) is obviously rising and taking its place, so racism ends up being obliquely adjacent to the more direct fear of the state. In other words, general society is making progress with being comfortable with people of different races, whereas country of origin becoming more worrying and slowing down progress.

What a strange disconnect there. We don't fear individuals, we fear what they represent.

(I ate a gummy an hour ago tho sooooo I feel like I'm just stating the obvious so ... Maybe?)

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

wtf? society is still obviously racist. you must not be black.

[–] catbum@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Exactly, that's why I qualified that statement with the terms "generally" across the globe and also distinguished being plainly racist (which I view as hate because of race itself, stereotypes at individual level) from racism that seems to primarily precipitate from fears of or for the state (hate because of the larger stereotyped idealogies or propaganda of that person's race, whether or not an individual espouses them).

I am not Black, this is true. I primarily worked my hypothesis out from a purportedly Chinese person saying they wouldn't trust the hiring of people from China. Now, their comment does seem to have a racist component. I don't know to what levels internalized racism is related to geopolitical fears, but if we consider that this Chinese person is likely not racist to themselves, e.g. hating their individual attributes, we can assume that they are not wary of the Chinese person for being Chinese. Their mistrust in the state makes them so wary they can't even be supportive of hiring people from China, in what I assume is the US. It seems like racism is only secondary to the primary fear of the state (or some geopolitical facet), the racism coming from a position of self-preservation rather than overt hate of the race.

Fear is going to be the death of us.

Also, I am high and pretty sure I just took the scenic route in describing xenophobia. Shit tits.

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

it sounds like you heard one specific situation and are conflating that with a general trend

[–] catbum@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And it sounds like you are still overlooking all of the qualifiers and nuance in my nonscholarly, inebriated statements. In neither post did I assert "society is not racist."

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago

you said you thought society was becoming less racist

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think it's not that.

Just when you are a member of a minority, communicating to others of the same minority feels weird.

Along patriotic lines - either you are a bit less real than them, or they than you, first.

Second, more importantly, among certain minorities some people trust "their own" more for business, employment, anything, and thus there are scams based purely on that.

Third, with people of a bit different background you are more eager to give some benefit or doubt or something when they show their personal downsides, with people of "your" group those downsides are much more infuriating and there's a fallacy of presuming you understand them better.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

thus there are scams based purely on that.

There absolutely are. The ownership of the company I work for is of a particular nationality, and every single time we have been given counterfeit bills as payment it has been from another member of said nationality, which the owner thinks is one of his "buddies."

Every time.

And it's usually those same guys trying to rip us off in other ways, too. I keep telling him that these motherfuckers are trying to take him for a ride about 75% of the time and it's plainly visible from an outside perspective, but he won't hear it. They're his countrymen. (No, I won't say which nationality.)

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You won't, but being Armenian (EDIT: by heritage, but not so much by immersion, so especially prone to meeting such attempts), I'd guess they are either Armenian or Georgian or maybe Jewish.

[–] FJW@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 months ago

Pretty scared of CCP spies TBH.

Okay, but this is a fundamentally different reason that isn’t born out of general racism or xenophobia.

It’s maybe not ideal, but I don’t consider this to be a morally reprehensible attitude.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

"From China" and "Chinese(-American)" aren't the same thing

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wasn't expecting that. I would understand that there a slight positive involontary bias towards candidates with a familiar-sounding name, but such shameless behavior is astonishing

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

That's not that surprising, if their Hispanic boss was from Cuba, they're probably a conservative and consuming a lot of right wing propaganda. I know a conservative Puerto Rican who's afraid of the ms13 gang. He lives in rural NJ.

[–] Jackfinished@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I know a few Hispanics who really don't like being Hispanic. Like refuse to talk in Spanish but when abuela calls he will.

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

If you are hiring in IT and skip everyone without a white-sounding name, you are definitely going to have a much smaller hiring pool.

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Naa it was a small business and he owned it.

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I mean to the labor board, or wherever ... there is a poster at every workplace that has the info about who to call when this happens.

[–] prosp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago
[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Are Latinos over represented in your company with respect to the population? That would be a defensible position for your boss on this. I mean if you had 85% Latinos that could be taken as evidence of some sort of ethnic bias in favor of Latinos.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

That would be a defensible position for your boss on this

Not legitimately, in my opinion. A candidate should never be hired or rejected to meet certain quotas.