this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
61 points (88.6% liked)

News

23627 readers
2756 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

277 deaths in 25 years. 11 people per year.

30% of Americans own guns.

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/06/22/the-demographics-of-gun-ownership/

The population in 2000 was 282.2 million people, so roughly 84,660,000 gun owners.

11/84,660,000 = such a small number, you need to represent it with scientific notation. By 2024 it's even smaller. 11/100,470,000.

No piece of technology is going to prevent such an edge case of human stupidity, if it weren't the magazine issue, it would be something else.

That being said, there's another preventative measure, my first gun had a little red pop-up when a round was in the chamber:

There was also a red marker if the safety was off:

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It doesn't really matter if it's an edge case or not. 277 people died because of it, many children. That's not ok. I understand that people will go to great lengths to defend (often illogically) what they feel is their right, but your rights end where someone else's rights begin. 277 lives, even if it's over 25 years, is not worth an unsecured bullet in the chamber. It's not even worth one life.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

277 people... over 25 years. It's statistically insignificant on a population of 300 million people.

By point of comparison:

https://www.cpsc.gov/Newsroom/News-Releases/2023/Nearly-Half-of-Incidents-with-Kids-and-Corded-Window-Coverings-Resulted-in-Death-GoCordless-to-Save-Lives

"On average, about nine children under 5 years of age die every year from strangling in window blinds, shades, draperies and other window coverings with cords."

So 225 over 25 years. Again, not statistically significant.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A child dying from something that could have been prevented cannot be dismissed as a simple statistical insignificance. That's the most cynical thing I've heard in a while.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Individual tragedies are never going to be prevented. You might as well mandate kids exist in giant hamster balls 24/7.

Oh, but then they might suffocate.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's perfectly preventable in other countries. In the western world, this is pretty much a uniquely American experience.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can't undo the 2nd amendment, there are over 400 million guns in the country.

The fact that there are only 11 deaths per year on a population of 400 million guns shows just how insignificant the problem is.

It's not even a "1 in a million" kind of thing.

It's a 1 in 36 million kind of thing.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It seems Trump has no problem advocating for undoing the 14th Amendment to ban birthright citizenship. If he does that, I see no problem undoing the 2nd Amendment.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, no amendment can be undone in the current climate.

Doing it requires 290 votes in the House, a body that last needed 15 tries to get a 218 vote simple majority to decide who their own leader will be.

Then you need a 67 vote majority in the Senate, a body that's blocked from doing anything by a 60 vote majority to break a filibuster.

If by some miracle, both of those things happen, then the change needs to be ratified by 38 states.

In the last election, Trump won 31 states, so he'd need 7 Harris states to back him on repealing an amendment. Aint happening.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We should ban seat belts, then. Theres a non-zero chance that they could trap you in a car in a crash leading to your death. Never mind that the chance is statistically insignificant.

Also, do other countries mandate this safety feature?

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Seat belts are designed specifically to save people's lives. In action, they prevent a lot more deaths than they cause. Firearms are designed specifically to take people's lives. In action, they cause a lot more deaths than they prevent.

It's hyperbole. An exaggerated example to prove a point.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Guns are used 60,000+ times per year in defensive situations.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -2 points 1 week ago

And hundreds of thousands of times in criminal situations, including more than 10,000 gun-related homicides.