this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
735 points (96.8% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9880 readers
1187 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
givesomefucks@lemmy.world
735
Two 26-Year-Olds: One Killed a Homeless Man, Another is Suspected of Killing a Healthcare CEO (zeteo.com)
submitted 1 week ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
176 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't forget that one case has already reached its conclusion while the second hasn't even begun trial.

There's still a lot than can happen that might prevent a guilty verdict.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hoo boy. There was plenty of video footage of the accused. He had the motive. When he was caught, he still had evidence on him. He had the means, the motive and the opportunity. By all means, he should be afforded a full and fair trial. However, if his lawyer is able to get the case thrown out or dismissed somehow, it'll be a legal miracle. I honestly have no clue what his defense will be. So far it seems to be "the cops planted the evidence" which I do not think will buy him the sympathy of a jury.

I believe that CEO was a fucking scumbag, but I'd also be inclined to pass a guilty verdict (assuming his defense attorney fails to change my mind). As much as I hate what that health insurance company did, I also would hate to live in a country where vigilante justice is meted out. I would have preferred the shooter pursue health care reform in a more democratic way, as I believe that is the civilized way to enact change. I can simultaneously sympathize with the shooter and condemn him.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Certainly does look a lot like first degree murder at first sight but from what I've seen even the whole story about the circumstance of his apprehension seems rather odd.

Also (and yes I know it's a long shot but still), the jury could simply refuse to indict him because they hate the victim far more than the crime.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also (and yes I know it’s a long shot but still), the jury could simply refuse to indict him because they hate the victim far more than the crime.

This'll be on the prosecution to try to impanel people that will follow the law instead of their hearts. The target aside, I think most people will rule harshly on murder, especially someone shot in the back.