this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
735 points (96.8% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9880 readers
855 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 320 points 1 week ago (3 children)

When a fraudster who tried to overthrow democracy and rightfully convicted of 34 felonies, still gets reelected as president, it is evident that there is no justice anymore.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 77 points 1 week ago (11 children)

You reminded me of something I read from back around when that bloke got elected, regarding amongst other things, the decline in the rule of law mattering to society...

"The greatness of Rome, brilliant with repeated marks of prosperity, has gradually faded... the ancient glory of military prowess and valour has almost passed away... by the growth of wealth and luxury.

The Roman world is falling: yet we concern ourselves with trifles… We heap up riches that perish and bury our gold in the earth as if we were piling up treasures in a lifetime of prosperity.

Rome was great and could tolerate its own vices as long as they were held in check by some degree of virtue; but when our hands ceased to uphold the laws, when avarice and luxury sapped the nation’s strength, the state itself lost control and went its way.

The finest men were shut out from office by the lowest dregs of society, who, having won the favour of the mob by base means, ventured to grasp at the highest offices.

The greater her glory, the more incredible it seems that she has been brought so low.

Empires are mortal. Rome has perished. Though she was built upon such firm foundations, Rome has sunk by her own weight."

- Ammianus Marcellinus, Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus, Tacitus, Aurelius Ambrosius, Aurelius Augustinus Hipponensis. 56 - 430 AD.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can you indicate which author is associated with which portion of your quoted text? I'm looking to verify the provenance of these statements. Thank you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's been evident long before Trump had anything to do with politics

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Agreed.

The wealthy and powerful sadly have always and will always have a preferential justice system.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is no justice system, it is a legal system. Justice does not exist within it.

[–] pfr@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 week ago

Came here to say exactly this

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

/ End Thread

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 125 points 1 week ago (1 children)

On Monday, 26-year-old Daniel Penny was acquitted after killing Jordan Neely, a desperate Black homeless man on the subway...

Tale as old as time.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (9 children)

“…on the grounds that he was trying to protect others.”

I think that’s a pretty fucking important line right there.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I think the point is, the system pushed one man to his breaking point simply for being poor, black, and mentally ill; resulting in his eventual strangulation on a subway. Not saying the the situation didn't require intervention but acting as if the whole thing was "unavoidable" or even "justified" gladiator giving all the context is Pretty Fucking Important

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Sharpiemarker@startrek.website 96 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I've seen people comparing the DOJ response to Luigi Mangioni and Kyle Shittenhouse. The fact that Rittenhouse is free should tell you everything you need to know.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (48 children)

Well the difference is that while both actively premeditated their murders whoever committed the crimes Mangioni has been accused of is far more of a menace because they had a specific target in mind and even worse it was someone rich instead of just anyone protesting the police tendency to murder.

[–] prayer@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago (24 children)

Rittenhouse attacked 3 people, that's 3x the danger. But I guess I forgot to count up their net worths.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)
[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago

A stark reminder of who the justice system works for. They are there to protect the rich elites.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago

Yup. The irony wasn't lost on us either.

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Our society ties worth to wealth.

To a capitalist, If you're homeless, you have less moral value than someone who exploited millions of people's need for healthcare for his own gain.

And there are a lot of capitalists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Sen. John Fetterman is one of those who has loudly insisted that the “public execution of an innocent man and father of two is indefensible.” We are expected to ignore the fact that for 14 months straight before Thompson’s killing, Israeli forces have publicly executed thousands of innocent men, women, and children in Gaza with the enthusiastic support of US politicians like Fetterman."

Normally I'm not one to dig into these things, but I seriously think fetterman died and the dude we hear from now is a stand in. Just such a 180... I remember when he was first gaining national prominence, had some interview in front of a Wawa off the freeway - when I saw THAT guy, I donated to his campaign and called my wife in to say, "listen to this for a second, I think this guy could be the president one day". That guy has ZERO DNA in common with the "Fetterman" we see and hear from today. It wasn't a stroke, or if it was, it was fatal.

[–] Pazu900@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm think it's from the stroke. They can cause a huge personality shift

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think these are comparable.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think that's the point of the article.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

You both make good points so I up voted.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

I think there are two primary reasons for the difference in treatment of these two killings

  1. The killing of the CEO was meant to be a message to the country. It's a different scale. Because something like this is such a spectacle, it gets national attention and the local and federal authorities are forced to deal with it quickly- otherwise they lose face.

  2. Ultimately the power structure cannot tolerate these types of rebellions. It's like a slave talking back to the master. You allow it once and you open the door for it to happen again. You have to try and shut it down as quickly as possible.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 13 points 1 week ago

Matt Stone killed a homeless man?

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 11 points 1 week ago (41 children)

This is not a juxtaposition at all. Terrible ethics aside, the CEO operated more or less totally in compliance with USA law. Being a fucking scumbag is not illegal -- indeed, our country sadly runs on this principle.

The fellow in the subway was acting to a DIRECT threat, and it's pretty easy to draw a line from that guy flipping out to someone being threatened/hurt/killed in the subway. He was already culpable of disorderly conduct or worse, and it's pretty clear that it wasn't Penny's intent to fatally injure him.

The juxtaposition some people feel is because the CEO is acting against their moral framework, but he's operating in a legal framework. This is why our country is fucking sick, but it is is what it is at this point.

load more comments (41 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

but killing rich people is illegal!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›